《Lancet,5月20日,Individual quarantine versus active monitoring of contacts for the mitigation of COVID-19: a modelling study》

  • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
  • 编译者: zhangmin
  • 发布时间:2020-05-21
  • Individual quarantine versus active monitoring of contacts for the mitigation of COVID-19: a modelling study

    Corey M Peak, ScD

    Rebecca Kahn, MS

    Yonatan H Grad, MD

    Lauren M Childs, PhD

    Ruoran Li, Mphil

    Prof Marc Lipsitch, Dphil

    et al.

    Show all authors

    Published:May 20, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30361-3

    Summary

    Background

    Voluntary individual quarantine and voluntary active monitoring of contacts are core disease control strategies for emerging infectious diseases such as COVID-19. Given the impact of quarantine on resources and individual liberty, it is vital to assess under what conditions individual quarantine can more effectively control COVID-19 than active monitoring. As an epidemic grows, it is also important to consider when these interventions are no longer feasible and broader mitigation measures must be implemented.

    Methods

    To estimate the comparative efficacy of individual quarantine and active monitoring of contacts to control severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), we fit a stochastic branching model to reported parameters for the dynamics of the disease. Specifically, we fit a model to the incubation period distribution (mean 5·2 days) and to two estimates of the serial interval distribution: a shorter one with a mean serial interval of 4·8 days and a longer one with a mean of 7·5 days. To assess variable resource settings, we considered two feasibility settings: a high-feasibility setting with 90% of contacts traced, a half-day average delay in tracing and symptom recognition, and 90% effective isolation; and a low-feasibility setting with 50% of contacts traced, a 2-day average delay, and 50% effective isolation.

  • 原文来源:https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30361-3/fulltext
相关报告
  • 《MedRxiv,3月8日,Modeling the Comparative Impact of Individual Quarantine vs. Active Monitoring of Contacts for the Mitigation of COVID-19》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:zhangmin
    • 发布时间:2020-03-09
    • Modeling the Comparative Impact of Individual Quarantine vs. Active Monitoring of Contacts for the Mitigation of COVID-19 Corey M Peak, Rebecca Kahn, Yonatan H Grad, Lauren M Childs, Ruoran Li, Marc Lipsitch, Caroline O Buckee doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.05.20031088 Abstract Individual quarantine and active monitoring of contacts are core disease control strategies, particularly for emerging infectious diseases such as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). To estimate the comparative efficacy of these interventions to control COVID-19, we fit a stochastic branching model, comparing two sets of reported parameters for the dynamics of the disease. Our results suggest that individual quarantine may contain an outbreak of COVID-19 with a short serial interval (4.8 days) only in settings with high intervention performance where at least three-quarters of infected contacts are individually quarantined. However, in settings where this performance is unrealistically high and the outbreak of COVID-19 continues to grow, so too will the burden of the number of contacts traced for active monitoring or quarantine. *注,本文为预印本论文手稿,是未经同行评审的初步报告,其观点仅供科研同行交流,并不是结论性内容,请使用者谨慎使用.
  • 《5月20日_个人隔离与监测接触者可有效缓解COVID-19疫情》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:xuwenwhlib
    • 发布时间:2020-05-21
    • 信息名称:个人隔离与监测接触者可有效缓解COVID-19疫情 1.时间:2020年5月20日 2.机构或团队:哈佛大学陈曾熙公共卫生学院、哈佛大学医学院、弗吉尼亚理工学院暨州立大学 3.事件概要: 哈佛大学陈曾熙公共卫生学院等在THE LANCET发表文章“Individual quarantine versus active monitoring of contacts for the mitigation of COVID-19: a modelling study”。 自愿隔离和监测接触者是COVID-19等传染病的核心控制策略。考虑到隔离对资源和个人自由的影响,评估在何种情况下个人隔离比监测更有效地控制COVID-19至关重要。随着疫情的增长,还必须考虑何时这些干预措施不再可行,以及何时必须实施更广泛的缓解措施。为了评价个体隔离和监测接触者对SARS-CoV-2的控制效果,文章拟合一个随机分支模型,以报告疾病动态的参数。文章将模型拟合到潜伏期分布(平均5.2天)和序列间隔分布(一个较短的序列间隔为4.8天,一个较长的序列间隔为7.5天),并且纳入了两个可行性设置:高可行性设置,跟踪90%的联系人,跟踪和症状识别平均延迟半天,有效隔离90%;低可行性设置,跟踪50%的联系人,平均延迟2天,有效隔离50%。研究显示,当资源优先用于物理距离等干预措施时,积极监测或对高危接触者的个人隔离可对缓解疫情作出协同贡献。 4.附件: 原文链接:https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30361-3/fulltext