登录
 机构网站
  1. 首页
  2. 情报产品
  3. 快讯详情

《MedRxiv，3月17日，Modelling the epidemic 2019-nCoV event in Italy: a preliminary note》

  • 来源专题：COVID-19科研动态监测
  • 编译者： zhangmin
  • 发布时间：2020-03-18

  • Modelling the epidemic 2019-nCoV event in Italy: a preliminary note

    Marco Claudio Traini, Carla Caponi, Giuseppe Vittorio De Socio

    doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.14.20034884

    Abstract

    An analysis of the time evolution of the 2019-nCoV outbreak event in Italy is proposed and is based on the preliminary data at disposal (till March 11th, 2020) on one side, and on an epidemiological model recently used to describe the same epidemic event in the Wuhan region (February 2020) on the other side. The equations of the model include the description of compartments like Susceptible (S), exposed (E), infectious but not yet symptomatic (pre-symptomatic) (A), infectious with symptoms (I), hospitalized (H) and recovered (R). Further stratification includes quarantined susceptible (Sq), isolated exposed (Eq) and isolated infected (Iq) compartments. The equations are numerically solved for boundary (initial) conditions tuned on the Italian event. The role of quarantine is specifically emphasized and supports the strategies adopted providing a numerical description of the effects.

    *注，本文为预印本论文手稿，是未经同行评审的初步报告，其观点仅供科研同行交流，并不是结论性内容，请使用者谨慎使用.

  • 原文来源：https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.14.20034884v1
6浏览量
原文链接
相关报告

  • 《3月17日_意大利特伦托大学等模拟2019-nCoV在意大利的流行》
    • 来源专题：COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者：xuwenwhlib
    • 发布时间：2020-03-19
    • 3月17日_意大利特伦托大学等模拟2019-nCoV在意大利的流行 1.时间：2020年3月17日 2.机构或团队：意大利特伦托大学、意大利佩鲁贾大学医院 3.事件概要： 特伦托大学和意大利佩鲁贾大学医院的科研人员在medRxiv预印本平台发表题为“Modelling the epidemic 2019-nCoV event in Italy: a preliminary note”的文章，提出了对意大利2019-nCoV暴发时间演变的分析，该分析一方面基于可利用的初步数据（至2020年3月11日），另一方面是最近用于描述武汉地区（2020年2月）同一流行病事件的流行病学模型。模型方程包括对易感（S），暴露（E），已感染但尚未有症状的（症状前）（A），已感染且有症状（I），住院（H）和康复（R）的描述。进一步的分层包括隔离易感（Sq），隔离暴露（Eq）和隔离感染（Iq）。文章特别强调了隔离的作用，并支持所采用的策略，对其影响进行了描述。 *注，本文为预印本论文手稿，是未经同行评审的初步报告，其观点仅供科研同行交流，并不是结论性内容，请使用者谨慎使用。 4.附件： 原文链接：https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.14.20034884v1
    6浏览量
    原文链接

  • 《MedRxiv，2月17日，Estimating the Efficacy of Traffic Blockage and Quarantine for the Epidemic Caused by 2019-nCoV (COVID-19)》
    • 来源专题：COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者：dingxq
    • 发布时间：2020-02-18
    • Estimating the Efficacy of Traffic Blockage and Quarantine for the Epidemic Caused by 2019-nCoV (COVID-19) Deqiang Li, Qinghe Liu, Zhicheng Liu, Zefei Gao, Junkai Zhu, Junyan Yang, Qiao Wang doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.14.20022913 Abstract Since the outbreaks of the epidemic in Wuhan, China caused by 2019-nCoV (COVID-19), the cumulative number of confirmed cases are increasing day by day and a large number of population all over the world were at risk. The traffic blockage and quarantine can alleviate the risk of larger epidemic and lower the number of infections, which is essential to adjusting the control polices and instructing the public responses. A Flow-SEIR model was used to estimate the number of infections, based on the confirmed cases data released by the National Health Commission of China and the migration data during the Chinese Spring Festival by the Baidu Migration. We define two factors related to traffic blockage and quarantine to estimate the efficacy of these two intervation measures. In our study, since the government urges the public to stay at home and self-protective, the self-protection at home is also accounted as a part of quarantine. In the results, the quarantine is very effective for epidemic control, which can reduce the number of infections by nearly 90%. And the effect of quarantine is stronger than the traffic blockage control. Early warning of epidemic situation is significantly important to the adjustment of traffic blockage control policy. If there is 1 day in advance for urban blockage, about 3600 people will eventually be reduced in the country. If there is 1 day of delay, about 1800 people will finally be at risk. However, provincial level traffic blockage can only alleviate 21.06% - 22.38% of the peak number of the infections. *注，本文为预印本论文手稿，是未经同行评审的初步报告，其观点仅供科研同行交流，并不是结论性内容，请使用者谨慎使用.
    3浏览量
    原文链接