《LANCET,3月17日,COVID-19 in pregnant women – Authors' reply》

  • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
  • 编译者: zhangmin
  • 发布时间:2020-03-18
  • COVID-19 in pregnant women – Authors' reply

    David Baud

    Eric Giannoni

    Léo Pomar

    Xiaolong Qi

    Karin Nielsen-Saines

    Didier Musso

    et al.

    Show all authors

    Published:March 17, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30192-4

    We are grateful for the concerns of Manuel Schmidt and colleagues about our previous guidelines1 for pregnant women with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. At the time we developed the algorithm (February, 2020), there were no data regarding potential vertical transmission from infected mothers and outcomes in newborns. To date, there has been no evidence of vertical transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) based on two small clinical series.2, 3 According to WHO, delayed umbilical cord clamping is highly unlikely to increase the risk of transmitting pathogens from the mother to the fetus even in the case of maternal infection.4 Because the vernix caseosa contains antimicrobial peptides, we recommend leaving it in place until 24 h after birth.5 New data examining neonates from infected mothers could be reassuring, but transmission after birth via contact with infectious respiratory secretions is still a concern, and physical separation of mother from child should be considered. Separation is a standard practice in pulmonary tuberculosis and is discussed in cases of maternal influenza infection.6 Therefore, separation of the mother and her newborn baby should be individually discussed by an interdisciplinary team, considering local facilities and risk factors for adverse neonatal outcomes, such as prematurity and fetal distress.

  • 原文来源:https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30192-4/fulltext
相关报告
  • 《LANCET,3月17日,COVID-19 in pregnant women》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:zhangmin
    • 发布时间:2020-03-18
    • COVID-19 in pregnant women Manuel B Schmid Jehudith Fontijn Nicole Ochsenbein-Kölble Christoph Berger Dirk Bassler Published:March 17, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30175-4 With interest, we read the recommendation on the management of pregnant women with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by Guillaume Favre and colleagues.1 Some of the recommendations made in the flowsheet of their Correspondence have long-term consequences (eg, termination of pregnancy, no breastfeeding) of an unforeseeable extent, are harmful when applied to the general population (eg, early cord clamping in extremely preterm infants, no breastfeeding, separation of the mother from the newborn), are not proven to reduce the risk of transmission in other viral illnesses (eg, early cleaning of the newborn), and are contradictory to the current recommendations by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19; eg, testing of asymptomatic people, no breastfeeding).
  • 《LANCET,4月3日,Baricitinib for COVID-19: a suitable treatment? – Authors' reply》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:xuwenwhlib
    • 发布时间:2020-04-04
    • Baricitinib for COVID-19: a suitable treatment? – Authors' reply Peter J Richardson,Mario Corbellino,Justin Stebbing Published:April 03, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30270-X We thank Ennio Favalli and colleagues for their Correspondence regarding our suggestion to use baricitinib for the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections.1, 2 We also appreciate their recognition that inhibition of numb-associated kinase enzymes could indeed be beneficial in preventing virus infectivity via inhibition of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. We welcome the opportunity to more fully explain the possible use of baricitinib in the current pandemic. Indeed, we accept that using a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor to treat a viral disease might appear illogical given that the antiviral effects of interferons are largely mediated by the JAK–STAT signalling pathway. However, the administration of pegylated-interferon has not had the beneficial antiviral effects originally hoped for,4 and clinical trials with interferons have yielded inconsistent results, with pathogenic effects of interferons being observed in some viral infections.