《Mind, madness and melancholia: Ideas and institutions in psychiatry from classical antiquity to the present》

  • 来源专题:科学技术史学科动态
  • 发布时间:2016-05-10
  • about this event

    This conference will entertain and educate, exploring mental health through the eyes of the ancient world, and taking a tour through history. It will include highlights by Professor Julian Hughes such as “If only the ancients had DSM 5, all would have been clear.”

    Additionally, the well-known author of several books on the history of psychiatry, Professor Andrew Scull, Distinguished Professor of Sociology and Science Studies University of California, will be joining us from San Diego.

    Professor Glen Most, Professor of Ancient Greek, Scuola Normale, Pisa, Italy and Professor at the Committee on Social Thought Chicago Univeristy is another notable speaker.

    The aims and objectives for this meeting are to:

    •Understand the way psychiatry was seen through the eyes of the Ancient, Arab and early modern world

    •Understand the development of the specialty of Psychiatry in the context of prevailing culture

    •Explore the history of ideas about mental illness and develop an awareness of our own position in the arc of the history of psychiatry

    •Critically examine the current state and future of psychiatry and its institutions

    This event is part of the "Psychiatry in dialogue with neuroscience medicine and society" series and is being held in associated with the Royal College of Psychiatrists History of Psychiatry Special Interest Group.

    please note: Pre registration is required to attend the annual dinner which will follow the meeting.

相关报告
  • 《CFP: From Knowledge to Profit? Scientific Institutions and the Commercialization of Science》

    • 来源专题:科学技术史学科动态
    • 编译者:ihns
    • 发布时间:2016-01-14
    • October 10-12, 2016, Germany Call for papers The relationship of science and technology – often seen as the relation of basic and applied research – is a constant theme in science and technology studies. Especially the commercialization of scientific research has steadily gained attention in the last years. Our workshop will focus on scientific institutions such as universities, independent research institutes and other national and international scientific organizations, and the roles they play in the commercialization of science. The contributions to the workshop should examine the process of commercialization in science with a special focus on scientific institutions and their internal and external relationships in the second half of the 20th century. Papers applying a comparative approach are especially welcome. Proposals are invited from all relevant perspectives: science studies; history of science, medicine and technology; cultural studies; business history; economic history; and the history of law. Definition and Agenda According to our definition, commercialization of science is the utilization of scientific work and knowledge for commercial purposes in various ways, including ‘feedback reactions’ of commercialization processes on scientific research. From a historical perspective the commercialization of science is not new. Various forms of cooperation between industry and academic science reach far back in time, though a consensus has been reached that it has been deeply rearranged in the last few decades. Foremost, commercial criteria now have a stronger influence on scientific research than ever before. Some recognize a profound transformation of academic traditions in these developments (truth oriented vs. application; concept of mode1/mode2), others highlight the increased importance of universities for economic development in relationship with the industry and the state (concept of the triple helix). As an alternative it has been suggested to analyze the different commercialization regimes of science (Mirowski and Sent 2008). Our starting point is that the ways and methods of commercialization have been diverse. Processes of commercialization affect institutions in many ways and on various levels, comprise different dimensions and take place in specific social contexts. The Cold War, the competition of political systems, economic crises, privatization, deregulation, and globalization come to mind. We see the capitalist economic system and the transformations of capitalist societies as an overarching point of reference. However, we include processes of commercialization in non-capitalist social systems. Our goal is to contribute to the understanding of the temporally, regionally and nationally different mechanisms of commercialization and their political economies in a historical context. Themes and research questions The workshop covers a broad spectrum of aspects of commercialization in the second half of the 20th century with an emphasis on national and international comparisons. We welcome contributions that focus on scientific institutions and their governance, intellectual property law, financing and economics, the practices and effects of commercialization, science policy, and discourse. Next to the relatively often studied theme of patent protection, themes may include the licensing of research instruments, terms and clauses in employment contracts, publishing clauses, contract research, cooperation with industries, convergence of civil and military research contexts (dual-use-problem), outsourcing, start-ups and spin-offs, the architecture and spaces of technology transfer, and the politicization and the (public) debates of problems surrounding commercialization. Overarching questions are: What is the object of commercialization at universities, independent research institutions and other scientific organizations (including foundations, societies and associations)? When and how has the concept of commercialization changed? What where the driving forces of commercialization inside and outside of scientific institutions? In which ways did particular institutions change due to commercialization processes? To what extent did the ‘market’ influence the production methods of scientific knowledge and how did market forces change scientific practice? To what extent did commercial viability become a criterion of scientific innovation? Who where the significant actors in the research institutions, and how did they act in a national and international context? Finally, we are interested in the relationship of commercialization and knowledge and technology transfer, which has been a dominating concept of innovation studies and science policy studies in the last years. Deadline for abstracts (250-300 words): 28 February 2016 Contact Info: Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin Research program „History of the Max Planck Society” (GMPG) Jaromir Balcar, Florian Schmaltz, Alexander von Schwerin Contact Email: commercialization@mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de Deadline: February 28, 2016 Posted: January 12, 2016
  • 《Students Connect Boston’s Busing Past to Present through Digital Archives》

    • 来源专题:科学技术史学科动态
    • 发布时间:2016-04-20
    • Marilyn Morgan, director of UMass Boston’s Archives program, is providing graduate students with a hands-on education about the busing crisis in Boston—without the “white gloves” that might come to mind when picturing archivists at work. “It may seem esoteric at times, but history does matter,” Morgan said. “The stereotype is that archivists sit in a room with little white gloves and go through documents, but that’s not true at all. They’re constantly engaging with the public about things that matter.” She chose one of Boston’s most contentious periods as the focus of her new course, Transforming Archives in a Digital Age. UMass Boston graduate students use digital scanning software through a partnership with the Boston City Archives to upload letters, photographs, legal documents, artwork, and other artifacts to create an online exhibit and digital archives from the viewpoints of the many stakeholders involved in the court-ordered desegregation of Boston Public Schools in the 1970s. Each student zeroes in on a perspective of his or her choosing and contributes artifacts to the online archive throughout the semester. Exhibit topics range from the clash of church versus state; the views of students for or against the court action; domestic and international responses toward Mayor Kevin White; and the police and law enforcement officials caught up in the middle of the issue. “Learning out of a textbook can be really boring for people, but if you click on the primary source documents, you can see them in high resolution and see it for yourselves, that this is the evidence,” said Lauren Prescott, a New Bedford native who is completing a master’s degree in history and a certificate in archives. “Especially if high school students today are looking at it, they’re seeing how students their age felt 40 years ago. It’s a great way for students to connect with their own history.” For Prescott, the course also has proven critical to achieving her goal of becoming a professional archivist. Through the coursework in Morgan’s class, she’s already landed an internship at the Boston City Archives, and now works as an administrator supporting the South End Historical Society. “This whole project has a public-facing mission, that’s what I like about it,” she said. “People can sit at home in their pajamas and learn. Not everyone necessarily can go to the archive, or would be interested in going.” Daniel Morast, of Sandwich, who hopes to spend his retirement working in a history museum once he finishes his master’s degree, has used the course to brush up on twenty-first century archiving skills, but also to explore the way law enforcement responded to the crisis. His coursework has him interacting with the Boston mayor’s office and turning up forty-year-old letters requesting that the U.S. Air Marshal activate the 82nd Airborne Division of the U.S. Army to help Boston and state police mitigate the public’s response. “This project says to the people of Boston, we have our own issues right here, and we’re not so squeaky clean,” he added. “Kids today need to learn about their parents and their neighbors and the issues they faced, whether they were the victims or the perpetrators.” Not all students take the course toward a history master’s degree or certificate in archives. Several American studies students have fallen in love with archiving through the course as well, Morgan said. Though they approach the class from different levels of experience, each student learns how to digitize materials, create metadata, and catalog archival materials according to Library of Congress Subject Headings and other standards. Morgan said she hopes the completed project will eventually become a tool for Boston Public Schools teachers to use as they approach a new busing curriculum implemented in light of the 40th anniversary of the conflict. “It’s a piece of our history,” Morgan said. “People need to realize that everyone has a bias. If we can point people to the direct source to learn about a topic they’re interested in, that’s great.”