《CFP: From Knowledge to Profit? Scientific Institutions and the Commercialization of Science》

  • 来源专题:科学技术史学科动态
  • 编译者: ihns
  • 发布时间:2016-01-14
  • October 10-12, 2016, Germany

    Call for papers

    The relationship of science and technology – often seen as the relation of basic and applied research – is a constant theme in science and technology studies. Especially the commercialization of scientific research has steadily gained attention in the last years. Our workshop will focus on scientific institutions such as universities, independent research institutes and other national and international scientific organizations, and the roles they play in the commercialization of science.

    The contributions to the workshop should examine the process of commercialization in science with a special focus on scientific institutions and their internal and external relationships in the second half of the 20th century. Papers applying a comparative approach are especially welcome. Proposals are invited from all relevant perspectives: science studies; history of science, medicine and technology; cultural studies; business history; economic history; and the history of law.

    Definition and Agenda

    According to our definition, commercialization of science is the utilization of scientific work and knowledge for commercial purposes in various ways, including ‘feedback reactions’ of commercialization processes on scientific research. From a historical perspective the commercialization of science is not new. Various forms of cooperation between industry and academic science reach far back in time, though a consensus has been reached that it has been deeply rearranged in the last few decades. Foremost, commercial criteria now have a stronger influence on scientific research than ever before. Some recognize a profound transformation of academic traditions in these developments (truth oriented vs. application; concept of mode1/mode2), others highlight the increased importance of universities for economic development in relationship with the industry and the state (concept of the triple helix). As an alternative it has been suggested to analyze the different commercialization regimes of science (Mirowski and Sent 2008).

    Our starting point is that the ways and methods of commercialization have been diverse. Processes of commercialization affect institutions in many ways and on various levels, comprise different dimensions and take place in specific social contexts. The Cold War, the competition of political systems, economic crises, privatization, deregulation, and globalization come to mind. We see the capitalist economic system and the transformations of capitalist societies as an overarching point of reference. However, we include processes of commercialization in non-capitalist social systems. Our goal is to contribute to the understanding of the temporally, regionally and nationally different mechanisms of commercialization and their political economies in a historical context.

    Themes and research questions

    The workshop covers a broad spectrum of aspects of commercialization in the second half of the 20th century with an emphasis on national and international comparisons. We welcome contributions that focus on scientific institutions and their governance, intellectual property law, financing and economics, the practices and effects of commercialization, science policy, and discourse. Next to the relatively often studied theme of patent protection, themes may include the licensing of research instruments, terms and clauses in employment contracts, publishing clauses, contract research, cooperation with industries, convergence of civil and military research contexts (dual-use-problem), outsourcing, start-ups and spin-offs, the architecture and spaces of technology transfer, and the politicization and the (public) debates of problems surrounding commercialization.

    Overarching questions are: What is the object of commercialization at universities, independent research institutions and other scientific organizations (including foundations, societies and associations)? When and how has the concept of commercialization changed? What where the driving forces of commercialization inside and outside of scientific institutions? In which ways did particular institutions change due to commercialization processes? To what extent did the ‘market’ influence the production methods of scientific knowledge and how did market forces change scientific practice? To what extent did commercial viability become a criterion of scientific innovation? Who where the significant actors in the research institutions, and how did they act in a national and international context? Finally, we are interested in the relationship of commercialization and knowledge and technology transfer, which has been a dominating concept of innovation studies and science policy studies in the last years.

    Deadline for abstracts (250-300 words): 28 February 2016

    Contact Info:

    Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin

    Research program „History of the Max Planck Society” (GMPG)

    Jaromir Balcar, Florian Schmaltz, Alexander von Schwerin

    Contact Email:

    commercialization@mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de

    Deadline: February 28, 2016

    Posted: January 12, 2016

相关报告
  • 《CFP: Resources and Economies of Knowledge in the Anthropocene》

    • 来源专题:科学技术史学科动态
    • 发布时间:2016-04-20
    • Veranstalter: Nadin Heé (Friedrich-Meinecke-Institut, Freie Universität Berlin); Helge Wendt (Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin), Berlin Datum, Ort: 12.09.2016-13.09.2016, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin Deadline: 30.04.2016 Organic and inorganic resources have provided and continue to provide the foundations for the development of human societies. Yet the processes and mechanisms through which knowledge about their use and exploitation co-evolved with societal praxis over centuries are highly context related. The production, dissemination and appropriation of knowledge about natural resources is interwoven both with the specific material cultures of a society or group and with it's political, economic and cultural conditions. The workshop will focus on the knowledge economies of natural resources during the past 200 years, a period defined as the Anthropocene by the chemist Paul J. Crutzen: an age in which human influence has become so dominant that it has surpassed the influence of geophysical and other natural forces on the earth’s geo-biological system. The Anthropocene has seen a significant increase in the exploitation of natural resources on a global scale, which has led to the present situation in which the loss and shortage of several natural resources has become evident. To fully understand how local practices and techniques make use of resources, or how economic and social institutions exploit them, the global conditions in which these resources are situated must first be investigated. The workshop seeks to understand the mechanisms and asymmetrical forms in which knowledge economies of resources evolved during the Anthropocene, a period that, in terms of history of politics, economics and culture, is defined by colonialism, imperialism, decolonization, nationalism and neocolonial environments. The workshop moreover seeks to understand how access to and transfer of knowledge relates to transnational, international and global networks that are organized as economic enterprises and understood as so-called modernization processes. We assume that natural resources with agricultural, maritime or subterranean origins have their own particular histories: histories of the use and exploitation of particular resources; histories of the development of knowledge for defining, analyzing and describing a resource; and histories of the transformation of nature. Theoretically and methodologically, we are particularly interested in discussing how we can (re)write a global history of the Anthropocene when resources are the focus of our attention. We would like to discuss whether recent approaches in the fields of global history of knowledge and environmental history are especially promising in this regard, and how they are able to interact with approaches in the fields of economic or political history. This call for papers invites proposals that trace the production, dissemination and appropriation of knowledge concerning resources throughout the Anthropocene. We are interested in discussing some of the following questions from either a micro- or macro-historical perspective: - How did knowledge concerning resources co-evolve and interact with societal circumstances? - How did practical knowledge circulate and how were technologies and infrastructures disseminated geographically through globalization processes that were related to public or private economies during periods of colonialism and imperialism? - How was the asymmetrical division of resources reinforced, and how were exclusion processes cemented by new territorial divisions and the exploration of new terrestrial, subterranean and maritime regions in the age of imperialism or during the Cold War? -How is the division of resources and knowledge about resources related to Anthropocenic processes? - How can differences in the development of knowledge and its application be explained? - How could knowledge about resources evolve into and adapt to new fields of application? The conference will be conducted in English. The organizers will cover (economy) travel and accommodation expenses for invited participants. Please send a short abstract of your proposed contribution (no more than 400 words) and a brief academic CV with institutional affiliation in one file to nadinhee@fu-berlin.de and hwendt@mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de. The deadline for proposals is April 30, 2016.
  • 《CFP: Globalization of Science in the Middle East and North Africa, 18th-20th Centuries》

    • 来源专题:科学技术史学科动态
    • 编译者:ihns
    • 发布时间:2016-03-24
    • March 24-25, 2017, The College of the Holy Cross Call for papers The Center for Religion, Ethics, and Culture and the Middle Eastern Studies Concentration at the College of the Holy Cross (http://www.holycross.edu) invites abstract submissions (300-400 words) for a conference to be held March 24-25, 2017 entitled, The Globalization of Science in the Middle East and North Africa, 18th-20th Centuries (see abstract below). Abstracts are due by June 15, 2016. Send abstracts to Sahar Bazzaz and Jane Murphy at globalizationofscience@gmail.com. Participants will be notified of their participation by July 1st, 2016. Conference participants will receive airfare/travel, ground transportation costs, and accommodation for the duration of the conference. In preparing their abstracts, potential participants should plan to produce an 8000-10,000 word paper for pre-circulation before the conference takes place. Conference participants are expected to contribute their papers to an edited volume, which will be the final outcome of the conference. Conference Abstract: The nineteenth and twentieth centuries mark the period in which science became globalized and institutionalized as a dominant epistemology trumping all others. The scientific study of the natural world (Botany, Taxonomy, Systematics, Geology, Comparative zoology), of human behavior and society (Psychology and Sociology), and of the past (History and Archeology) emerged and developed their own disciplinary methodologies and notions of expertise and professionalism. As a way of understanding the globalization of science in non-European contexts such as the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), scholars have turned to the field sciences such as natural history, geology, and cartographic surveying, highlighting these disciplines’ intimate connection to imperial conquest and global trade networks.Drawing on germinal works of Michel Foucault and Edward Said, some have argued that the ‘sciences’ served as a powerful tool in the hands of European conquerors. According to this view, disciplines including mapping, statistical census gathering, natural history, archaeology, and the taxonomy of peoples, languages, and religious traditions allowed Europeans to define, categorize and order—to“know”—colonized territories and peoples and hence to dominate and rule them. But as critics have pointed out, this perspective problematically attributes the spread of the taxonomical revolution beyond Europe to “the often violent imposition of ‘rationality’ on cultures originally endowed with ‘another reason’.” Furthermore, science as an epistemology is now firmly entrenched in and embraced by Middle Eastern societies suggesting that its advent was something more than simply imposition. In order to challenge the ‘science as imposition’ narrative and to develop a more nuanced understanding of the globalization of science in the region—its perceived promises and perils and the role of local epistemologies in the development of modern science—this panel considers the reception/assimilation/rejection/translation of scientific theories and practices by the peoples of the region through examples from a variety of scientific disciplines. While the politics of knowledge production occurred in the context of state modernization (as in Ottoman Egypt and the central lands of the Ottoman empire), on one hand, and the extension of European power into these regions, on the other, the panel considers other social, economic, and intellectual developments, which shaped (and were shaped by) this process. This conference brings together scholars from the Middle East, Europe, the United States, and Canada, and will explore important issues related to the history of science in the MENA region during the 18th-20th centuries—a critical period of change and modernization when Middle Easterners were concerned about the rising power of European states and societies and the weakness of Islamic ones in relation to them. Conference participants will present papers, which consider the nature of encounters between Islamic societies and the west as the balance of power between these regions shifted in the favor of Europe, including the role of science in modernization and development in the MENA region, the relationship between modern science and religion (Islam), the effects of European imperialism on the spread of modern science in the MENA (and the Global South more generally), and the use of science and technology by MENA states and societies to combat foreign domination in the region. Contact Info: Sahar Bazzaz and Jane Murphy Contact Email: gloablizationofscience@gmail.com Deadline: June 15, 2016 Posted: March 14, 2016