《射血分数保留的心力衰竭β受体阻滞剂缺乏》

  • 来源专题:心血管疾病防治
  • 编译者: 张燕舞
  • 发布时间:2018-05-22
  • β受体阻滞剂治疗减少射血分数降低(HFrEF)的心力衰竭患者的症状和死亡率,但β受体阻滞剂治疗对保留射血分数(HFpEF)的心力衰竭患者的疗效尚不确定。 一项单独的患者级荟萃分析评估了β受体阻滞剂对窦性心律患者心衰的疗效。 β受体阻滞剂治疗可降低HFrEF患者的死亡率和心血管死亡率,但HFpEF患者的小部分患者没有获益,尽管置信区间很大。 如果没有其他适应症,我们建议不要使用HFpEF的β受体阻滞剂。

    Aims Recent guidelines recommend that patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 40-49% should be managed similar to LVEF ≥ 50%. We investigated the effect of beta-blockers according to LVEF in double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

    Methods and results Individual patient data meta-analysis of 11 trials, stratified by baseline LVEF and heart rhythm (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT0083244; PROSPERO: CRD42014010012). Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death over 1.3 years median follow-up, with an intention-to-treat analysis. For 14 262 patients in sinus rhythm, median LVEF was 27% (interquartile range 21-33%), including 575 patients with LVEF 40-49% and 244 ≥ 50%. Beta-blockers reduced all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to placebo in sinus rhythm, an effect that was consistent across LVEF strata, except forthose in the small subgroup with LVEF ≥ 50%. For LVEF 40-49%, death occurred in 21/292 [7.2%]randomized to beta-blockers compared to 35/283 [12.4%]with placebo; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.59 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-1.03]. Cardiovascular death occurred in 13/292 [4.5%]with beta-blockers and 26/283 [9.2%]with placebo; adjusted HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.24-0.97). Over a median of 1.0 years following randomization (n = 4601), LVEF increased with beta-blockers in all groups in sinus rhythm except LVEF ≥50%. For patients in atrial fibrillation at baseline (n = 3050), beta-blockers increased LVEF when < 50% at baseline, but did not improve prognosis.

    Conclusion Beta-blockers improve LVEF and prognosis for patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm with a reduced LVEF. The data are most robust for LVEF < 40%, but similar benefit was observed in the subgroup of patients with LVEF 40-49%.

相关报告
  • 《窦性心律患者心力衰竭患者缺乏阿司匹林的益处》

    • 来源专题:心血管疾病防治
    • 编译者:张燕舞
    • 发布时间:2018-05-22
    • 阿司匹林对心力衰竭窦性心律患者的安全性和有效性尚不确定。 在对无心房颤动病史的心力衰竭患者进行的一项登记研究中,3840名服用小剂量阿司匹林的患者倾向于同样数量的未服用阿司匹林的患者倾向匹配阿司匹林和非阿司匹林组的死亡率和卒中率相似。 然而,在阿司匹林组中观察到较高的心力衰竭再入院率,这在一些但不是全部的先前研究中已经观察到。 阿司匹林的使用也与心肌梗塞风险增加有关,但不能排除残余混杂。 我们建议不要使用阿司匹林治疗心力衰竭患者,而没有针对这种治疗的具体指征。 OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess safety and effectiveness of low-dose aspirin in heart failure (HF) not complicated by atrial fibrillation. BACKGROUND Despite lack of evidence, low-dose aspirin is widely used in patients with HF and sinus rhythm with and without prior ischemic heart disease. METHODS The study included 12,277 patients with new-onset HF during 2007 to 2012 who had no history of atrial fibrillation. Of 5,450 patients using low-dose aspirin at baseline, 3,840 were propensity matched to non-aspirin users in a 1:1 ratio. Propensity-matched Cox models were calculated with respect to the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke and the secondary outcomes of bleeding and HF readmission. RESULTS The composite outcome occurred in 1,554 (40.5%) patients in the aspirin group and 1,604 (41.8%) patients in the non-aspirin group. Aspirin use was not associated with an altered risk of composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91 to 1.05), but it was associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.67), whereas no differences were observed in all-cause mortality and stroke. An increased risk of HF readmission was observed in the aspirin group (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.33). No difference in bleeding was observed. In subgroup analyses on the basis of a history of ischemic heart disease, the results were similar to the main result. CONCLUSIONS No association was detected between low-dose aspirin use and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality,
  • 《射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭患者的最佳药物治疗和预后》

    • 编译者:黄雅兰
    • 发布时间:2024-11-21
    • 背景 通过整合射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭(HFrEF)的指导性药物治疗(GDMT)的使用和剂量,最佳药物治疗(OMT)评分可以对HFrEF的临床风险进行分层。 目标 本研究的目的是通过OMT评分衍生的治疗组来描述患者的特征和相关的长期临床结果。 方法 CHAMP-HF(改变心力衰竭患者的管理)包括接受≥1次GDMT的美国慢性HFrEF门诊患者。按照HF合作实验室协会的建议,根据GDMT的基线使用和剂量,OMT亚组被定义为次优(得分< 3)、可接受(得分= 3)和最佳(得分≥4)。校正人口统计学和临床协变量后,Cox比例风险分析用于评估各亚组的全因死亡和心血管死亡。 结果 作者研究了CHAMP-HF登记的4582名参与者,进行了为期2年的随访。平均年龄为68岁,1327人(29%)为女性,2842人(62%)为非西班牙裔白人。人群中的OMT评分中位数为4 (Q1-Q3: 2-5),1628人(35%)为次优,665人(14%)为可接受,2289人(50%)为最佳治疗。与接受或次优治疗的参与者相比,接受最佳治疗的参与者更年轻,家庭年收入更高,并且是从专门的心衰诊所招募的(P均< 0.001)。接受最佳治疗的参与者的全因死亡率较低(调整后HR:0.77;95% CI: 0.64-0.92)和心血管死亡(调整后HR:0.79;95%可信区间:0.65-0.96)。 结论 在一个大型的慢性非卧床HFrEF队列中,OMT对全因死亡和心血管死亡的分层风险进行了评分。