《窦性心律患者心力衰竭患者缺乏阿司匹林的益处》

  • 来源专题:心血管疾病防治
  • 编译者: 张燕舞
  • 发布时间:2018-05-22
  • 阿司匹林对心力衰竭窦性心律患者的安全性和有效性尚不确定。 在对无心房颤动病史的心力衰竭患者进行的一项登记研究中,3840名服用小剂量阿司匹林的患者倾向于同样数量的未服用阿司匹林的患者倾向匹配阿司匹林和非阿司匹林组的死亡率和卒中率相似。 然而,在阿司匹林组中观察到较高的心力衰竭再入院率,这在一些但不是全部的先前研究中已经观察到。 阿司匹林的使用也与心肌梗塞风险增加有关,但不能排除残余混杂。 我们建议不要使用阿司匹林治疗心力衰竭患者,而没有针对这种治疗的具体指征。

    OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess safety and effectiveness of low-dose aspirin in heart failure (HF) not complicated by atrial fibrillation.

    BACKGROUND Despite lack of evidence, low-dose aspirin is widely used in patients with HF and sinus rhythm with and without prior ischemic heart disease.

    METHODS The study included 12,277 patients with new-onset HF during 2007 to 2012 who had no history of atrial fibrillation. Of 5,450 patients using low-dose aspirin at baseline, 3,840 were propensity matched to non-aspirin users in a 1:1 ratio. Propensity-matched Cox models were calculated with respect to the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke and the secondary outcomes of bleeding and HF readmission.

    RESULTS The composite outcome occurred in 1,554 (40.5%) patients in the aspirin group and 1,604 (41.8%) patients in the non-aspirin group. Aspirin use was not associated with an altered risk of composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91 to 1.05), but it was associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.67), whereas no differences were observed in all-cause mortality and stroke. An increased risk of HF readmission was observed in the aspirin group (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.33). No difference in bleeding was observed. In subgroup analyses on the basis of a history of ischemic heart disease, the results were similar to the main result.

    CONCLUSIONS No association was detected between low-dose aspirin use and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality,

相关报告
  • 《射血分数保留的心力衰竭β受体阻滞剂缺乏》

    • 来源专题:心血管疾病防治
    • 编译者:张燕舞
    • 发布时间:2018-05-22
    • β受体阻滞剂治疗减少射血分数降低(HFrEF)的心力衰竭患者的症状和死亡率,但β受体阻滞剂治疗对保留射血分数(HFpEF)的心力衰竭患者的疗效尚不确定。 一项单独的患者级荟萃分析评估了β受体阻滞剂对窦性心律患者心衰的疗效。 β受体阻滞剂治疗可降低HFrEF患者的死亡率和心血管死亡率,但HFpEF患者的小部分患者没有获益,尽管置信区间很大。 如果没有其他适应症,我们建议不要使用HFpEF的β受体阻滞剂。 Aims Recent guidelines recommend that patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 40-49% should be managed similar to LVEF ≥ 50%. We investigated the effect of beta-blockers according to LVEF in double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Methods and results Individual patient data meta-analysis of 11 trials, stratified by baseline LVEF and heart rhythm (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT0083244; PROSPERO: CRD42014010012). Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death over 1.3 years median follow-up, with an intention-to-treat analysis. For 14 262 patients in sinus rhythm, median LVEF was 27% (interquartile range 21-33%), including 575 patients with LVEF 40-49% and 244 ≥ 50%. Beta-blockers reduced all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to placebo in sinus rhythm, an effect that was consistent across LVEF strata, except forthose in the small subgroup with LVEF ≥ 50%. For LVEF 40-49%, death occurred in 21/292 [7.2%]randomized to beta-blockers compared to 35/283 [12.4%]with placebo; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.59 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-1.03]. Cardiovascular death occurred in 13/292 [4.5%]with beta-blockers and 26/283 [9.2%]with placebo; adjusted HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.24-0.97). Over a median of 1.0 years following randomization (n = 4601), LVEF increased with beta-blockers in all groups in sinus rhythm except LVEF ≥50%. For patients in atrial fibrillation at baseline (n = 3050), beta-blockers increased LVEF when < 50% at baseline, but did not improve prognosis. Conclusion Beta-blockers improve LVEF and prognosis for patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm with a reduced LVEF. The data are most robust for LVEF < 40%, but similar benefit was observed in the subgroup of patients with LVEF 40-49%.
  • 《SGLT2抑制剂预防2型糖尿病患者肾衰竭》

    • 来源专题:新药创制
    • 编译者:李永洁2
    • 发布时间:2019-11-01
    • 背景 钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2 (SGLT2)抑制剂对肾功能衰竭的影响,特别是需要透析或移植或因肾脏疾病而死亡的影响尚不确定。此外,以往的研究未能有力地评估不同水平的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和蛋白尿对肾脏预后影响的异质性。我们的目的是做一个系统的回顾和荟萃分析,以评估SGLT2抑制剂对2型糖尿病患者主要肾脏预后的影响,并确定不同试验和不同水平eGFR和蛋白尿的效果的一致性。 方法 我们对SGLT2抑制剂的随机、对照、心血管或肾脏结果试验进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,这些试验报告了SGLT2抑制剂对2型糖尿病患者主要肾脏结果的影响。从数据库建立到2019年6月14日,我们搜索了MEDLINE和Embase,以确定合格的试验。主要结果是透析、移植或死于肾病。我们使用随机效应模型获得了总相对风险(RRs)的95% ci和随机效应的荟萃回归,以探讨基线eGFR、蛋白尿、肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)阻断剂等亚组的影响。这篇评论是在PROSPERO (CRD42019131774)上注册的。 发现 从2085年的记录中,有四项研究符合我们的纳入标准,评估了三种SGLT2抑制剂:empagliflozin (EMPA-REG结果)、canagliflozin (CANVAS程序和CREDENCE)和dapagliflozin (declaretimi 58)。共有38723名参与者,其中252人需要透析或移植,或死于肾病,335人发展为终末期肾病,943人有急性肾损伤。SGLT2抑制剂显著降低了因肾脏疾病导致的透析、移植或死亡的风险(RR 0·67,95% CI 0·52-0·86,p=0·0019),这一效应在各研究中一致(I2=0%, p异质性=0·53)。SGLT2抑制剂还可减少终末期肾病(0·65,0·53-0·81,p<0·0001)和急性肾损伤(0·75,0·66-0·85,p<0·0001),各研究的疗效一致。虽然我们发现了一些证据表明SGLT2抑制剂的比例效应可能随着肾功能下降而减弱(ptrend=0·073),但有明确的、单独的证据表明所有eGFR亚组都有益处,包括eGFR基线为每1·73 m2 30-45 mL/min的参与者(RR 0·70,95% CI 0·54-0·91,p=0·0080)。无论基线蛋白尿(ptrend=0·66)和RAS阻滞(p异质性=0·31),雷诺保护在所有研究中也一致。 解释 SGLT2抑制剂可降低2型糖尿病患者因肾病透析、移植或死亡的风险,并对急性肾损伤提供保护。这些数据为使用SGLT2抑制剂预防2型糖尿病患者的主要肾脏结局提供了实质性证据。