《New nanodevice shifts light's color at single-photon level》

  • 来源专题:中国科学院西安光机所服务
  • 编译者: opt_weiz
  • 发布时间:2016-04-20
  • False-colored scanning electron micrograph of the nanophotonic frequency converter, consisting of a ring-shaped resonator (shaded blue) into which light is injected using a waveguide (shaded red). The input signal, depicted as a purple arrow, is converted to a new frequency (blue arrow) through the application of two pump lasers (light and dark red arrows). Credit: K. Srinivasan et al./NIST Converting a single photon from one color, or frequency, to another is an essential tool in quantu...

相关报告
  • 《Shedding new light on nanolasers using 2-D semiconductors》

    • 来源专题:后摩尔
    • 编译者:shenxiang
    • 发布时间:2020-05-14
    • In his latest line of research, Cun-Zheng Ning, a professor of electrical engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University, and his peers explored the intricate balance of physics that governs how electrons, holes, excitons and trions coexist and mutually convert into each other to produce optical gain. Their results, led by Tsinghua University Associate Professor Hao Sun, were recently published in the Nature publication Light: Science & Applications. "While studying the fundamental optical processes of how a trion can emit a photon [a particle of light] or absorb a photon, we discovered that optical gain can exist when we have sufficient trion population," Ning says. "Furthermore, the threshold value for the existence of such optical gain can be arbitrarily small, only limited by our measurement system." In Ning's experiment, the team measured optical gain at density levels four to five orders of magnitude—10,000 to 100,000 times—smaller than those in conventional semiconductors that power optoelectronic devices, like barcode scanners and lasers used in telecommunications tools. Ning has been driven to make such a discovery by his interest in a phenomenon called the Mott transition, an unresolved mystery in physics about how excitons form trions and conduct electricity in semiconductor materials to the point that they reach the Mott density (the point at which a semiconductor changes from an insulator to a conductor and optical gain first occurs). But the electrical power needed to achieve Mott transition and density is far more than what is desirable for the future of efficient computing. Without new low-power nanolaser capabilities like the ones he is researching, Ning says it would take a small power station to operate one supercomputer. "If optical gain can be achieved with excitonic complexes below the Mott transition, at low levels of power input, future amplifiers and lasers could be made that would require a small amount of driving power," Ning says. This development could be game-changing for energy-efficient photonics, or light-based devices, and provide an alternative to conventional semiconductors, which are limited in their ability to create and maintain enough excitons. 文章信息:More information: Zhen Wang et al, Excitonic complexes and optical gain in two-dimensional molybdenum ditelluride well below the Mott transition, Light: Science & Applications (2020). DOI: 10.1038/s41377-020-0278-z 文章链接:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41377-020-0278-z
  • 《EU’s lack of ambition could gut the Paris climate Agreement 》

    • 来源专题:能源战略信息监测
    • 编译者:giecinfo
    • 发布时间:2016-03-14
    • Last week the European Commission (EC), the EU’s executive body, released its assessment of the implications of the Paris Agreement on global climate action. The contents of this document are alarmingly inadequate. The EU led the celebrations in Paris and heralded the agreement as one that could save the world from runaway climate change. Now the EC seems to want to gut the Paris Agreement before it's even been signed. The Commission says that the EU's target of 40% emissions cuts by 2030 is “ambitious” and “in line with science”. It claims “Paris vindicates the EU's approach”, adding that the EU will only consider “progressively more ambitious action for the period beyond 2030”, even in light of new science on 'the implications of a 1.5C goal'. This is dismissive of climate science, which says the world has drastically cut emissions, and quickly, and the EU’s global responsibilities as a major producer and consumer of fossil fuel energy and the world's largest single market. The EU has a target of 80-95% emissions cuts by 2050 which comes from the 2007 IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) report. Cuts of 40% by 2030 jeopardise that long-term target. A 80-95% 2050 target is consistent with a global 2-2.4C temperature increase. The 40% by 2030 target is not in line with the Paris Agreement goal of global temperatures “well below 2C”, far less 1.5C. Taking into account its historical responsibility as well as its potential to act, Europe remains a long way from committing to its fair share of the global effort on climate change. All this, and it's not even a hundred days since the Paris Agreement was triumphantly feted. What on earth is going on? The main problem seems to be the Commission's inward-looking reluctance to provoke sceptical countries like Poland. It’s about as defeatist as you can get. Fortunately, many European member state governments have questioned the Commission’s position. Countries such as Germany, Austria and Portugal are making it clear that the EU needs to raise the bar on climate action, and that the current targets do not fulfil Europe’s responsibilities or potential. As the Austrian environment minister put it: “I’m missing the oomph in the Commission’s proposal. We mustn’t let ambition droop”. Now we have to hope these governments will lobby the executive to change its position, if only so that the blame for undermining Paris doesn't land on their shoulders. They should bear in mind how EU climate action is perceived beyond her borders – in both developed and developing countries. Here is how climate advocates outside Europe are reacting: Ultimately the Paris Agreement is strong on aspiration and weak on detail. For the EU to not be totally disingenuous when it goes to the signing ceremony of the Paris Agreement in New York next month it needs to be ready to increase its climate targets. And crucially it needs to speed-up the transition of its energy system to deliver them.