《Australia, US See Low Cost Green Hydrogen On Horizon》

  • 来源专题:可再生能源
  • 编译者: 武春亮
  • 发布时间:2024-04-01
  • Australia, US See Low Cost Green Hydrogen On Horizon .
    March 29, 2024 4 hours ago Tina Casey 2 Comments
    Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News! The emerging green hydrogen industry threatens to squeeze natural gas out of the global hydrogen supply chain, but so far the threat has been an empty one due to high costs. Hydrogen produced from natural gas currently ranges about US$1.00 to $3.00, while green hydrogen costs three times as much, or more. Government subsidies can make up some of the difference, but the real impact won’t be felt until new technologies and economies of scale kick in.
    Low Cost Green Hydrogen To Kick Natural Gas Out Of Global Supply Chain, Eventually.
    Green hydrogen gets a lot of attention as a fuel for zero emission fuel cell vehicles, though it has yet to gain traction in mobility markets. A more promising area activity consists of non-mobility markets that are difficult to decarbonize through direct electrification alone. That includes steelmaking and other heavy industries as well as chemical production and construction equipment, among other use cases where fossil energy still holds a firm grip.
    BloombergNEF editor Kamala Schelling outlined the cost barrier last summer, citing a figure of $0.98-$2.93 per kilogram for gray hydrogen, meaning hydrogen sourced from natural gas. In contrast, green hydrogen comes in at $4.5-$12 per kilogram.
    “In every single market we’ve surveyed, green hydrogen is more expensive than its gray counterpart,” BNEF hydrogen analyst Adithya Bhashyam told Schelling.
    “Yet in their most recent levelized cost of hydrogen analysis, Bhashyam and his team found that a tipping point is just around the corner,” Schelling wrote. “From 2030 on, they find, producing green hydrogen in a new plant could be as much as 18% cheaper than continuing to run an existing gray hydrogen plant in five major economies around the world.
    However, There Is A Catch (Or Two).
    For those of you new to the topic, green hydrogen refers to electrolysis systems, which deploy electricity from renewable resources to “split” hydrogen gas from water. In contrast, gray hydrogen is produced by submitting natural gas to a steam reformation process. Gasified coal also supplies part of the global hydrogen chain.
    Don’t break out the green hydrogen pom-poms just yet. The numbers came from the BNEF 2023 Hydrogen Levelized Cost Update, which modeled 28 markets. Green hydrogen only beats gray hydrogen in eight of those markets by 2030, when new-built green hydrogen electrolyzer facilities are compared with existing natural gas reformation plants.
    That’s one catch. However, the picture improves significantly when new-built steam reformation plants are compared to new electrolyzer facilities.
    “Using Western-made alkaline systems, green hydrogen beats out blue hydrogen by 2030 in all but a handful of modeled markets,” Bhashyam told BNEF, referring to steam reformation systems coupled with carbon capture.
    And that’s the other catch. Alkaline electrolysis systems are less expensive and more suitable for large-scale production than the other available alternative, PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane) electrolyzers. However, alkaline systems produce a lower-grade hydrogen, which limits their use.
    The Long (Or Short) Road To Low-Cost Green Hydrogen.
    Australia and the US have made the list of best-case markets for competitive green hydrogen production, mainly due to the abundance of low-cost renewable energy. Apparently Australia is not resting on its reputation. Though performance improvements in alkaline systems could help bring quality up while keeping costs down, a researchers at Griffith University in Australia anticipate that the cost of PEM systems will drop, making it a more competitive alternative.
    The research team modeled various PEM scenarios in a new study under the title, “Economics of renewable hydrogen production using wind and solar energy: A case study for Queensland, Australia.” They concluded that with proper sizing and scale-up, PEM electrolyzers powered by wind and solar resources could produce hydrogen at AU$3.00 per kilogram, which comes out to about US$2.00.
    “The model assumes that small-scale to large-scale wind turbine (WT)-based and photovoltaic (PV)-based power generation plants are directly coupled with an electrolyser array and utilises hourly generation data for the Gladstone hydrogen-hub region,” the researchers explained.
    Chip in a few dollars a month to help support independent cleantech coverage that helps to accelerate the cleantech revolution!
    More Green Hydrogen For The USA.
    The US is also not taking the competition standing still. The US Department of Energy has set an ambitious goal of bringing down the cost of green hydrogen to $1.00 per kilogram, where it can compete with the lowest-cost gray hydrogen.
    On March 13, the Energy Department announced the selection of 52 different projects, totaling $750 million in funding from the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, aimed squarely at that target. With additional cost-share funding from the awardees, the total cost of the program is $1.6 billion.
    The emphasis is on bringing down the cost of both fuel cell and electrolyzer systems. The program also includes funding for end-of-life handling and recycling of electrolysis systems.
    “The projects are expected to enable U.S. manufacturing capacity to produce 14 gigawatts of fuel cells per year, enough to power 15% of medium- and heavy-duty trucks sold each year, and 10 gigawatts of electrolyzers per year, enough to produce an additional 1.3 million tons of clean hydrogen per year,” the Energy Department explained, noting that “industrial and chemical processes like steelmaking and fertilizer production” are the target markets, along with heavy-duty transportation.
    The Energy Department also anticipates that renewable energy stakeholders will feel the follow-on effect of increased electricity demand from hydrogen producers.
    “Clean hydrogen can also support the expansion of clean electricity by providing a means for long-duration energy storage and offering flexibility and multiple revenue streams for all types of clean power generation—including renewables, advanced nuclear, and other innovative technologies,” the agency explains.
    Many Roads To Low-Cost Green Hydrogen.
    If you caught that thing about nuclear energy, that is a thing. Some stakeholders have been floating the idea of using nuclear power plants to run electrolyzer systems. However, the $750 million round of funding is not focusing on the source of the electricity. That comes into play under the Energy Department’s $8 billion Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs program, which is also funded through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.
    The new round of funding includes both electrolyzer and fuel cell projects focusing on scaling up volume, and improving automation and quality control, while reducing supply chain risks, in addition to facilitating end-of-life materials recovery.
    The program also zeroes in on key electrolyzer components including catalysts and  membranes, along with innovative new materials, components, and systems designs.
    The innovation angle is the key to achieving the $1.00 per kilogram goal. “Longer-term cost reductions enabled by these cutting-edge projects are likely to play a significant role in achieving DOE’s Hydrogen Shot goal,” the Energy Department explains, referring to the $1.00 per kilogram benchmark.
    For those of you interested in more details, the Energy Department provides a keyw0rd-searchable lookup tool for all 52 hydrogen and fuel cell projects. The website also includes a map indicating that most of the projects are clustered along the eastern seaboard. If you have any thoughts about that, drop us a note in the comment thread.
    Follow me @tinamcasey on Bluesky, Threads, Post, and LinkedIn.
    Image: US Department of Energy awards $750 million in funding for new, cost-cutting green hydrogen and fuel cell projects (courtesy of DOE).
    Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here. Latest CleanTechnica TV Video.
    Advertisement   CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here .
    Share this story!.
    LinkedIn .
    WhatsApp .
    Facebook .
    X .
    Email .
    Mastodon .
    Reddit .
    Tina Casey.
    .
    Tina specializes in advanced energy technology, military sustainability, emerging materials, biofuels, ESG and related policy and political matters. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on LinkedIn, Threads, or Bluesky.
    Tina Casey has 3279 posts and counting. See all posts by Tina Casey .
  • 原文来源:https://cleantechnica.com/2024/03/29/australia-us-see-low-cost-green-hydrogen-on-horizon/
相关报告
  • 《Australia to invest a billion bucks into clean energy and fuels》

    • 来源专题:生物质生化转化信息监测
    • 编译者:giecinfo
    • 发布时间:2016-03-27
    • In Australia, the Federal Government announced that it is establishing a $1 billion Clean Energy Innovation Fund to support emerging technologies make the leap from demonstration to commercial deployment. The Clean Energy Innovation Fund will target projects such as large-scale solar with storage, off-shore energy, biofuels and smart grids. Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said that “the strong suite of climate change policies will work to achieve our commitment to reduce emissions by 26 to 28 per cent by 2030. This target is ambitious but achievable.” The $1 billion Clean Energy Innovation Fund will be jointly managed by the Clean Energy Finance Corporation and the Australian Renewable Energy Agency, drawing on their complementary experience and expertise. It will provide both debt and equity for clean energy projects. The fund The $1 billion Clean Energy Innovation Fund will be established from within the CEFC’s $10 billion allocation. This Fund will make available $100 million a year for ten years. Previously, the Liberal Government under former PM Tony Abbot, a climate skeptic, had announced plans to scrap the Clean Energy Finance Corporation and the Australian Renewable Energy Agency. By contrast, the Turnbull Government said it will “retain and reinvigorate the Clean Energy Finance Corporation and the Australian Renewable Energy Agency as part of our strong commitment to supporting jobs and innovation through investment in clean and renewable energy in Australia.” The refocused agencies will work together to provide capital investment in Australian businesses and emerging clean energy technologies. The Government said that “ARENA will continue to manage its existing portfolio of grants and deliver the announced $100 million large-scale solar round, and will be given an expanded focus beyond renewable energy to enable energy efficiency and low emissions technology. This will provide greater alignment with the CEFC and ensure that ARENA is able to support the full spectrum of emerging clean energy technology options. Once the $100 million large-scale solar round is complete, ARENA will move from a grant based role to predominantly a debt and equity basis under the Clean Energy Innovation Fund.” The government added that “The changes announced work hand in hand with the Emissions Reduction Fund, the Renewable Energy Target, the National Energy Productivity Plan and our broader support for clean energy to reduce emissions and drive productivity across the energy sector.” Reaction from the community The Clean Energy Finance Corporation said it welcomed the Australian Government’s announcement that the organisation will have a greater focus around innovation, through the new fund. The CEFC also, not surprisingly, “welcomes the Government’s confirmation that it will retain the CEFC and the Australian Renewable Energy Agency.” CEFC CEO Oliver Yates said: “The creation of the CEIF will help innovative entrepreneurial companies build their commercial strength, so they can make a positive contribution to the Australian economy and our national emissions challenge.” Labor Party: “Window dressing” The Australian Labor Party opposition leader Bill Shorten described the changes as “all front and no substance,” charging that ‘What we see is Mr Turnbull scrambling with window dressing to pretend that he’s not the same as Mr Abbott.” Australian media outlets noted that the changes did not represent new commitments to spending on clean energy, but rather a restoration of spending that originally was proposed at higher levels by the former Labor Government but scheduled for the scrap-heap by the Abbott Government. Legislation that created ARENA allowed for $1.3 billion in grants. John Connor of the Climate Institute told the ABC that “The core role of ARENA was to bring forward new innovations, to actually get these trialled and tested and begin the process of getting them ready for the market. The Clean Energy Finance Corporation’s core role was to help bring them to the market. So let’s not get rid of ARENA’s core role, which is that grant role, which is an investment. But Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said, “Historically, and you see it across the board, the Federal Government has been very much like an ATM (automatic teller machine). It’s been making grants, and the object has been to make the grant without frankly a lot of follow-up as to whether it’s effective. By ensuring that you take a more economic approach, you will ensure that you have a much more rigorous analysis, and that you will get a better quality of investment and a better quality of project.” Climate Minister Greg Hunt added, “Instead of giving 100 per cent of the taxpayers’ money away, our goal is to receive 100 per cent of the taxpayers’ money back, but with an additional return.” The Digest’s Take Althoguh we note that the policy announced by the Liberal Government is in many respects well short of industry support levels from the Labor Party, now in opposition — far better to have two parties wrangling over whether $1.3 billion or $1.0 billion is the right investment, and whether that should be in the form of grants, or debt and equity — than the previous battle over whether there should be a clean energy investment scheme at all. With both major parties now agreed on vigorous support for clean energy, investors can have confidence that the policy support has solidified, and that Australia has shifted towards a consensus on clean energy that is remarkable in contrast to the ruinous attempts by the Labor Government to unilaterally impose a more ambitious, though laudable, clean energy structure. The brilliantly-intentioned Australian carbon tax, rushed into the market, did little to spur long-term clean energy investment and energy security — in fact, it frightened governments around the world from imposing carbon taxes at all when they saw the tax become an election issue and led, in part, to the toppling of the Labor government at the polls. We note that no major low-carbon road transport at-scale project has been announced for years in Australia — but with both major parties now in support of clean energy investment, we expect to see investor interest galvanized. And with both Virgin Australia and Air New Zealand tipping a stronger interest in deploying advanced low-carbon fuels at scale and the US Navy looking for refueling options for the Great Green Fleet — we may well see an uptick in project action Down Under in the near future.
  • 《ribbon arrays for enhanced hydrogen evolution reaction》

    • 来源专题:现代化工
    • 编译者:武春亮
    • 发布时间:2024-07-15
    • Skip to content Accessibility Links Skip to content Skip to search IOPscience Skip to Journals list Accessibility help IOP Science home Accessibility Help Search Journals Journals list Browse more than 100 science journal titles Subject collections Read the very best research published in IOP journals Publishing partners Partner organisations and publications Open access IOP Publishing open access policy guide IOP Conference Series Read open access proceedings from science conferences worldwide Books Publishing Support Login IOPscience login / Sign Up Close Click here to close this panel. Search all IOPscience content Article Lookup Select journal (required) Select journal (required)2D Mater. (2014 - present)Acta Phys. Sin. (Overseas Edn) (1992 - 1999)Adv. Nat. Sci: Nanosci. Nanotechnol. (2010 - present)Appl. Phys. Express (2008 - present)Biofabrication (2009 - present)Bioinspir. Biomim. (2006 - present)Biomed. Mater. (2006 - present)Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express (2015 - present)Br. J. Appl. Phys. (1950 - 1967)Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys. (2001 - 2008)Chin. J. Chem. Phys. (1987 - 2007)Chin. J. Chem. Phys. (2008 - 2012)Chinese Phys. (2000 - 2007)Chinese Phys. B (2008 - present)Chinese Phys. C (2008 - present)Chinese Phys. Lett. (1984 - present)Class. Quantum Grav. (1984 - present)Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. (1980 - 1992)Combustion Theory and Modelling (1997 - 2004)Commun. Theor. Phys. (1982 - present)Comput. Sci. Discov. (2008 - 2015)Converg. Sci. Phys. Oncol. (2015 - 2018)Distrib. Syst. Engng. (1993 - 1999)ECS Adv. (2022 - present)ECS Electrochem. Lett. (2012 - 2015)ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. (2012 - present)ECS Sens. Plus (2022 - present)ECS Solid State Lett. (2012 - 2015)ECS Trans. (2005 - present)EPL (1986 - present)Electrochem. Soc. Interface (1992 - present)Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. (1998 - 2012)Electron. Struct. (2019 - present)Eng. Res. Express (2019 - present)Environ. Res. Commun. (2018 - present)Environ. Res. Lett. (2006 - present)Environ. Res.: Climate (2022 - present)Environ. Res.: Ecology (2022 - present)Environ. Res.: Energy (2024 - present)Environ. Res.: Food Syst. (2024 - present)Environ. Res.: Health (2022 - present)Environ. Res.: Infrastruct. Sustain. (2021 - present)Eur. J. Phys. (1980 - present)Flex. Print. Electron. (2015 - present)Fluid Dyn. Res. (1986 - present)Funct. Compos. Struct. (2018 - present)IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. (2008 - present)IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. (2009 - present)IOPSciNotes (2020 - 2022)Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. (2019 - present)Inverse Problems (1985 - present)Izv. Math. (1993 - present)J. Breath Res. (2007 - present)J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. (2003 - present)J. Electrochem. Soc. (1902 - present)J. Geophys. Eng. (2004 - 2018)J. High Energy Phys. (1997 - 2009)J. Inst. (2006 - present)J. Micromech. Microeng. (1991 - present)J. Neural Eng. (2004 - present)J. Nucl. Energy, Part C Plasma Phys. (1959 - 1966)J. Opt. (1977 - 1998)J. Opt. (2010 - present)J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. (1999 - 2009)J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. (1999 - 2005)J. Phys. A: Gen. Phys. (1968 - 1972)J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. (1975 - 2006)J. Phys. A: Math. Nucl. Gen. (1973 - 1974)J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. (2007 - present)J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. (1988 - present)J. Phys. B: Atom. Mol. Phys. (1968 - 1987)J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. (1968 - 1988)J. Phys. Commun. (2017 - present)J. Phys. Complex. (2019 - present)J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. (1968 - present)J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. (1968 - 1989)J. Phys. Energy (2018 - present)J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. (1971 - 1988)J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. (1989 - present)J. Phys. G: Nucl. Phys. (1975 - 1988)J. Phys. Mater. (2018 - present)J. Phys. Photonics (2018 - present)J. Phys.: Condens. Matter (1989 - present)J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. (2004 - present)J. Radiol. Prot. (1988 - present)J. Sci. Instrum. (1923 - 1967)J. Semicond. (2009 - present)J. Soc. Radiol. Prot. (1981 - 1987)J. Stat. Mech. (2004 - present)JoT (2000 - 2004)Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. (1962 - present)Laser Phys. (2013 - present)Laser Phys. Lett. (2004 - present)Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. (2019 - present)Mater. Futures (2022 - present)Mater. Quantum. Technol. (2020 - present)Mater. Res. Express (2014 - present)Math. USSR Izv. (1967 - 1992)Math. USSR Sb. (1967 - 1993)Meas. Sci. Technol. (1990 - present)Meet. Abstr. (2002 - present)Methods Appl. Fluoresc. (2013 - present)Metrologia (1965 - present)Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. (1992 - present)Multifunct. Mater. (2018 - 2022)Nano Ex. (2020 - present)Nano Futures (2017 - present)Nanotechnology (1990 - present)Network (1990 - 2004)Neuromorph. Comput. Eng. (2021 - present)New J. Phys. (1998 - present)Nonlinearity (1988 - present)Nouvelle Revue d'Optique (1973 - 1976)Nouvelle Revue d'Optique Appliquée (1970 - 1972)Nucl. Fusion (1960 - present)PASP (1889 - present)Phys. Biol. (2004 - present)Phys. Bull. (1950 - 1988)Phys. Educ. (1966 - present)Phys. Med. Biol. (1956 - present)Phys. Scr. (1970 - present)Phys. World (1988 - present)Phys.-Usp. (1993 - present)Physics in Technology (1973 - 1988)Physiol. Meas. (1993 - present)Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion (1984 - present)Plasma Physics (1967 - 1983)Plasma Res. Express (2018 - 2022)Plasma Sci. Technol. (1999 - present)Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. (1992 - present)Proc. Phys. Soc. (1926 - 1948)Proc. Phys. Soc. (1958 - 1967)Proc. Phys. Soc. A (1949 - 1957)Proc. Phys. Soc. B (1949 - 1957)Proc. Phys. Soc. London (1874 - 1925)Proc. Vol. (1967 - 2005)Prog. Biomed. Eng. (2018 - present)Prog. Energy (2018 - present)Public Understand. Sci. (1992 - 2002)Pure Appl. Opt. (1992 - 1998)Quantitative Finance (2001 - 2004)Quantum Electron. (1993 - present)Quantum Opt. (1989 - 1994)Quantum Sci. Technol. (2015 - present)Quantum Semiclass. Opt. (1995 - 1998)Rep. Prog. Phys. (1934 - present)Res. Astron. Astrophys. (2009 - present)Research Notes of the AAS (2017 - present)RevPhysTech (1970 - 1972)Russ. Chem. Rev. (1960 - present)Russ. Math. Surv. (1960 - present)Sb. Math. (1993 - present)Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. (2000 - 2015)Semicond. Sci. Technol. (1986 - present)Smart Mater. Struct. (1992 - present)Sov. J. Quantum Electron. (1971 - 1992)Sov. Phys. Usp. (1958 - 1992)Supercond. Sci. Technol. (1988 - present)Surf. Topogr.: Metrol. Prop. (2013 - present)Sustain. Sci. Technol. (2024 - present)The Astronomical Journal (1849 - present)The Astrophysical Journal (1996 - present)The Astrophysical Journal Letters (2010 - present)The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (1996 - present)The Planetary Science Journal (2020 - present)Trans. Amer: Electrochem. Soc. (1930 - 1930)Trans. Electrochem. Soc. (1931 - 1948)Trans. Opt. Soc. (1899 - 1932)Transl. Mater. Res. (2014 - 2018)Waves Random Media (1991 - 2004) Volume number: Issue number (if known): Article or page number: Nanotechnology Purpose-led Publishing is a coalition of three not-for-profit publishers in the field of physical sciences: AIP Publishing, the American Physical Society and IOP Publishing. Together, as publishers that will always put purpose above profit, we have defined a set of industry standards that underpin high-quality, ethical scholarly communications. We are proudly declaring that science is our only shareholder. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Antimony-assisted controlled growth of PtSe2 ribbon arrays for enhanced hydrogen evolution reaction Tian Li1, Liusi Yang2, Guangjie Zhang3, Jiaying Zhang4, Jingqi Feng1, Xinying Peng4, Peng Xu5, Shuli He2 and Donglin Ma1 Accepted Manuscript online 11 July 2024 ? © 2024 IOP Publishing Ltd What is an Accepted Manuscript? DOI 10.1088/1361-6528/ad61eb Download Accepted Manuscript PDF Figures Skip to each figure in the article Tables Skip to each table in the article References Citations Article data Skip to each data item in the article What is article data? Open science Article metrics Submit Submit to this Journal Permissions Get permission to re-use this article Share this article Article and author information Author e-mailsmadonglin@cnu.edu.cn Author affiliations1 department of physics, Capital Normal University, 105 W.3rd Ring Rd North, Haidian, Beijing, Beijing, 100037, CHINA 2 Capital Normal University, 105 W.3rd Ring Rd North, Haidian, Beijing, 100037, CHINA 3 National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, No.11 ZhongGuanCun BeiYiTiao, Haidian District, 100190, CHINA 4 Capital Normal University, 105 W.3rd Ring Rd North, Haidian, Beijing, Beijing, 100037, CHINA 5 National Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, No.11 ZhongGuanCun BeiYiTiao, Beijing, 100190, CHINA ORCID iDsTian Li https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9687-2289Guangjie Zhang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0498-3545Jiaying Zhang https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1996-0966Donglin Ma https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0536-1871 Dates Received 19 December 2023 Revised 11 March 2024 Accepted 11 July 2024 Accepted Manuscript online 11 July 2024 Journal RSS Sign up for new issue notifications 10.1088/1361-6528/ad61eb Abstract In this study, we report the successful synthesis of few-layer parallel PtSe2 ribbons on an Au foil employing a surface melting strategy via the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) growth method at 650℃. The controlled formation of parallel ribbons was directed by the Au steps generated through antimony treatment. These ribbons exhibit an average length of exceeding 100 μm and a width of approximately 100 nm across a substantial area. Electrocatalysis measurements showcase the catalytic performance of PtSe2 ribbons grown on Au foil, which can be further augmented through subsequent oxidation treatment. This investigation introduces an effective growth method for few-layer ribbons at low temperatures and broadens the scope of employing the substrate-guided strategies for the synthesis of one-dimensional materials. Additionally, it underscores the potential of PtSe2 ribbons as an electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS During the embargo period (the 12 month period from the publication of the Version of Record of this article), the Accepted Manuscript is fully protected by copyright and cannot be reused or reposted elsewhere. As the Version of Record of this article is going to be / has been published on a subscription basis, this Accepted Manuscript will be available for reuse under a CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 licence after the 12 month embargo period. After the embargo period, everyone is permitted to use copy and redistribute this article for non-commercial purposes only, provided that they adhere to all the terms of the licence https://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-nd/3.0 Although reasonable endeavours have been taken to obtain all necessary permissions from third parties to include their copyrighted content within this article, their full citation and copyright line may not be present in this Accepted Manuscript version. Before using any content from this article, please refer to the Version of Record on IOPscience once published for full citation and copyright details, as permissions may be required. All third party content is fully copyright protected, unless specifically stated otherwise in the figure caption in the Version of Record. Back to top 10.1088/1361-6528/ad61eb You may also like Journal articles Molecular beam epitaxy of PtSe2 using a co-deposition approach High carrier mobility in single-crystal PtSe2 grown by molecular beam epitaxy on ZnO(0001) Interfacial electronic properties of 2D/3D (PtSe2/CsPbX3) perovskite heterostructure PtSe2/graphene hetero-multilayer: gate-tunable Schottky barrier height and contact type Thickness-dependent ultrafast hot carrier and phonon dynamics of PtSe2 films measured with femtosecond transient optical spectroscopy Enhanced broadband light absorption of ultrathin PtSe2 in metal–insulator–metal structure IOPscience Journals Books IOP Conference Series About IOPscience Contact Us Developing countries access IOP Publishing open access policy Accessibility IOP Publishing Copyright 2024 IOP Publishing Terms and Conditions Disclaimer Privacy and Cookie Policy Publishing Support Authors Reviewers Conference Organisers This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. IOP Publishing Twitter page IOP Publishing Facebook page IOP Publishing LinkedIn page IOP Publishing Youtube page IOP Publishing WeChat QR code IOP Publishing Weibo page