《Nature,5月5日,COVID-19 pandemic: the effects of quarantine on cardiovascular risk》

  • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
  • 编译者: zhangmin
  • 发布时间:2020-05-06
  • COVID-19 pandemic: the effects of quarantine on cardiovascular risk

    Anna Vittoria Mattioli, Matteo Ballerini Puviani, Milena Nasi & Alberto Farinetti

    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2020)

    Abstract

    COVID-19 is causing a global pandemic with a high number of deaths and infected people. To contain the diffusion of COVID-19 virus, Governments have enforced restrictions on outdoor activities or even collective quarantine on the population. One important consequence of quarantine is a change in lifestyle: reduced physical activity and unhealthy diet. 2019 guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease indicate that “Adults should engage in at least 150 minute per week of accumulated moderate-intensity or 75 minute per week of vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity (or an equivalent combination of moderate and vigorous activity) to reduce ASCVD risk.” During quarantine, strategies to further increase home-based physical activity and to follow a healthy diet should be implemented. Quarantine carries some long-term effects on cardiovascular disease, mainly related to unhealthy lifestyle and anxiety. Following quarantine a global action supporting healthy diet and physical activity is mandatory to encourage people to return to good lifestyle.

  • 原文来源:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-020-0646-z
相关报告
  • 《Nature,2月5日,Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:zhangmin
    • 发布时间:2021-02-25
    • Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA Sahil Loomba, Alexandre de Figueiredo, Simon J. Piatek, Kristen de Graaf & Heidi J. Larson Nature Human Behaviour (2021) Abstract Widespread acceptance of a vaccine for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) will be the next major step in fighting the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but achieving high uptake will be a challenge and may be impeded by online misinformation. To inform successful vaccination campaigns, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in the UK and the USA to quantify how exposure to online misinformation around COVID-19 vaccines affects intent to vaccinate to protect oneself or others. Here we show that in both countries—as of September 2020—fewer people would ‘definitely’ take a vaccine than is likely required for herd immunity, and that, relative to factual information, recent misinformation induced a decline in intent of 6.2 percentage points (95th percentile interval 3.9 to 8.5) in the UK and 6.4 percentage points (95th percentile interval 4.0 to 8.8) in the USA among those who stated that they would definitely accept a vaccine. We also find that some sociodemographic groups are differentially impacted by exposure to misinformation. Finally, we show that scientific-sounding misinformation is more strongly associated with declines in vaccination intent.
  • 《CID,6月5日,100 Days of COVID-19 Prevention and Control in China》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:xuwenwhlib
    • 发布时间:2020-06-07
    • 100 Days of COVID-19 Prevention and Control in China Lei Zhou, M.D, Zunyou Wu, Ph.D, Zhongjie Li, M.D, Yanping Zhang, M.D, Jennifer M McGoogan, Ph.D, Qun Li, M.D, Xiaoping Dong, Ph.D, Ruiqi Ren, M.D, Luzhao Feng, Xiaopeng Qi Clinical Infectious Diseases, ciaa725, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa725 Published: 05 June 2020 Article history Abstract The epidemic of novel coronavirus diseases was first reported in China in late December 2019 and has been brought under control after some two months in China. However, it has become a global pandemic and the number of cases and deaths continues to increase outside of China. We describe the emergence of the pandemic, detail the first 100 days of China’s response as a Phase 1 Containment followed by Phase 2 Containment strategy, and briefly highlight areas of focus for the future. Specific, simple, and pragmatic strategies used in China for risk assessment, prioritization, and deployment of resources are described. Details of implementation, at different risk levels, of the traditional public health interventions are shared. Involvement of society in mounting a whole country response and challenges experienced with logistics and supply chains are described. Finally, the methods China is employing to cautiously re-start social life and economic activity are outlined.