《Virus Evolution,4月30日,No evidence for distinct types in the evolution of SARS-CoV-2》

  • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
  • 编译者: xuwenwhlib
  • 发布时间:2020-05-02
  • No evidence for distinct types in the evolution of SARS-CoV-2

    Oscar A MacLean, Richard J Orton, Joshua B Singer, David L Robertson

    Virus Evolution, veaa034, https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/veaa034

    Published: 30 April 2020 Article history

    Abstract

    A recent study by Tang et al. (2020) claimed that two major types of SARS-CoV-2 had evolved in the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and that one of these types was more “aggressive” than the other. Given the repercussions of these claims and the intense media coverage of these types of articles, we have examined in detail the data presented by Tang et al, and show that the major conclusions of that paper cannot be substantiated. Using examples from other viral outbreaks we discuss the difficulty in demonstrating the existence or nature of a functional effect of a viral mutation, and we advise against overinterpretation of genomic data during the pandemic.

  • 原文来源:https://academic.oup.com/ve/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ve/veaa034/5827470?searchresult=1
相关报告
  • 《4月30日_没有证据表明在SARS-CoV-2进化过程中存在不同类型》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:zhangmin
    • 发布时间:2020-05-02
    • 1.时间:2020年4月30日 2.机构或团队:格拉斯哥大学病毒研究中心 3.事件概要: 格拉斯哥大学病毒研究中心的科研人员在Virus Evolution期刊发表题为“No evidence for distinct types in the evolution of SARS-CoV-2”的文章。 文章指出,Tang等人[1](2020)最近的一项研究称,在COVID-19大流行中已经进化出两种主要的SARS-CoV-2类型,其中一种比另一种更具“侵略性”。考虑到这些主张的影响以及对这类文章的广泛报道,研究人员详细研究了Tang等人提供的数据,并表明该论文的主要结论无法得到证实。以其他病毒暴发为例,研究人员讨论了证明病毒突变功能作用的存在或性质的困难,并建议不要在大流行期间对基因组数据进行过度解释。 4.附件: [1] Tang, Xiaolu, et al. “On the Origin and Continuing Evolution of SARS-CoV-2.” National Science Review, doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaa036. 原文链接: https://academic.oup.com/ve/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ve/veaa034/5827470?searchresult=1
  • 《NSR,3月3日,On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:zhangmin
    • 发布时间:2020-03-05
    • On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 Xiaolu Tang, Changcheng Wu, Xiang Li, Yuhe Song, Xinmin Yao, Xinkai Wu, Yuange Duan, Hong Zhang, Yirong Wang, Zhaohui Qian ... Show moreAuthor Notes National Science Review, nwaa036, https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa036 Published: 03 March 2020 ABSTRACT The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic started in late December 2019 in Wuhan, China, and has since impacted a large portion of China and raised major global concern. Herein, we investigated the extent of molecular divergence between SARS-CoV-2 and other related coronaviruses. Although we found only 4% variability in genomic nucleotides between SARS-CoV-2 and a bat SARS-related coronavirus (SARSr-CoV; RaTG13), the difference at neutral sites was 17%, suggesting the divergence between the two viruses is much larger than previously estimated.