《MedRxiv,3月6日,The timing of one-shot interventions for epidemic control》

  • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
  • 编译者: zhangmin
  • 发布时间:2020-03-07
  • The timing of one-shot interventions for epidemic control

    Francesco Di Lauro, István Z Kiss, Joel Miller

    doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.02.20030007

    Abstract

    The apparent early success in China's large-scale intervention to control the COVID-19 epidemic has led to interest in whether other countries can replicate it as well as concerns about a resurgence of the epidemic if or when China relaxes the interventions. In this paper we look at the impact of a single short-term intervention on an epidemic. We see that if an intervention cannot be sustained long-term, it has the greatest impact if it is imposed once infection levels have become large enough that there is an appreciable number of infections present. For minimising the total number infected it should start close to the peak so that there is no rebound once the intervention is stopped, while to minimise the peak prevalence, it should start earlier, allowing two peaks of comparable size rather than one very large peak.

    *注,本文为预印本论文手稿,是未经同行评审的初步报告,其观点仅供科研同行交流,并不是结论性内容,请使用者谨慎使用.

  • 原文来源:https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.02.20030007v1
相关报告
  • 《MedRxiv,3月6日,The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:zhangmin
    • 发布时间:2020-03-07
    • The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China Moritz U.G. Kraemer, Chia-Hung Yang, Bernardo Gutierrez, Chieh-Hsi Wu, Brennan Klein, David M. Pigott, open COVID-19 data working group, Louis du Plessis, Nuno R Faria, Ruoran Li, William P. Hanage, John S Brownstein, Maylis Layan, Alessandro Vespignani, Huaiyu Tian, Christopher Dye, Simon Cauchemez, Oliver Pybus, Samuel V Scarpino doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.02.20026708 Abstract The ongoing COVID-19 outbreak has expanded rapidly throughout China. Major behavioral, clinical, and state interventions are underway currently to mitigate the epidemic and prevent the persistence of the virus in human populations in China and worldwide. It remains unclear how these unprecedented interventions, including travel restrictions, have affected COVID-19 spread in China. We use real-time mobility data from Wuhan and detailed case data including travel history to elucidate the role of case importation on transmission in cities across China and ascertain the impact of control measures. *注,本文为预印本论文手稿,是未经同行评审的初步报告,其观点仅供科研同行交流,并不是结论性内容,请使用者谨慎使用.
  • 《3月6日_萨塞克斯大学研究短期干预对流行病的影响》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:xuwenwhlib
    • 发布时间:2020-03-07
    • 信息名称:萨塞克斯大学研究短期干预对流行病的影响 1.时间:2020年3月6日 2.机构或团队:萨塞克斯大学、乐卓博大学 3.事件概要: 萨塞克斯大学等于2020年3月6日在medRxiv上发表题为“The timing of one-shot interventions for epidemic control”的文章,研究了短期干预对流行病的影响。 作者指出,如果一项干预措施无法长期持续,那么一旦感染水平变得足够大以至于存在相当数量的感染,那么实施干预措施将产生最大的影响。为了最大程度地减少感染总数,应该从接近峰值开始,以便一旦停止干预就不会出现反弹,而要最大程度地降低峰值流行率,则应该更早开始,允许两个类似大小的峰,而不是一个非常大的峰。在具有不同亚组的人群中,同步干预的效果不如分别针对每个亚组人群的干预效果。作者指出,如果干预是可持续的,则应保持。 *注,本文为预印本论文手稿,是未经同行评审的初步报告,其观点仅供科研同行交流,并不是结论性内容,请使用者谨慎使用. 4.附件: 原文链接:https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.02.20030007v1