《Science | 迁徙的塞伦盖蒂食草动物放牧演替中竞争与促进的相互作用》

  • 来源专题:战略生物资源
  • 编译者: 李康音
  • 发布时间:2024-02-20
  • 2024年2月15日,维克森林大学等机构的研究人员在Science上发表题为Interplay of competition and facilitation in grazing succession by migrant Serengeti herbivores的文章。

    竞争、促进和捕食为迁徙食草动物的演替模式提供了另一种解释。然而,这些相互作用很难测量,因此对体型依赖性放牧的机制甚至是否发生了演替存在不确定性。

    研究人员使用来自 8 年相机陷阱调查、GPS 项圈食草动物和粪便 DNA 元条形码的数据来分析塞伦盖蒂国家公园迁徙食草动物的时间、到达顺序和相互作用。时间放牧演替的特点是“推拉”动态:竞争性放牧将斑马推到共同迁徙的角马之前,而这些体型较大的迁徙者吃草会吸引尾随的小体型瞪羚,这些瞪羚受益于促进。涉及强烈野火和降雨的“自然实验”分别破坏和加强了这些影响。

    该研究结果强调了促进和竞争力量在共同调节大规模有蹄类动物迁徙方面的平衡。

  • 原文来源:https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adg0744
相关报告
  • 《生态相互作用塑造了植物防御的适应价值:草食动物攻击与光照的竞争 - 德弗里斯》

    • 来源专题:外来生物入侵
    • 编译者:王成卓
    • 发布时间:2018-11-05
    • 1.植物抵御各种各样的食草动物,这需要对有限的资源进行投资,而植物间也存在竞争。植物对防卫投资的结果由防御的代谢成本以及通过与其他有机体相互作用的间接(或生态)成本决定。这些生态成本对防御性状的进化具有潜在的强烈影响,但已被证明这难以量化。 2.我们旨在量化植物防卫投资的直接和间接(或生态)成本与效益,对草食和光的基因型间竞争的相对影响。此外,我们评估了植物防御对草食和种间竞争的平衡效益。 3.为此,我们利用黑芸苔的功能结构植物(FSP)模型,模拟植物生长发育、形态发生、草食和植物防御。在该模型中,防御的模拟投资通过与其他植物器官争夺资源而影响植物生长,并影响食草动物损害的水平和分布。 4.研究结果表明,光的跨基因型竞争的生态成本对被保护植物的适应性是非常有害的,因为它扩大了被保护植物和未被保护植物的大小差异。这导致草食动物损害抵消基因间竞争的假设下草食动物损害规模与植物规模的影响。此外,研究表明植物防御作用于减少草食动物的损害,而不是草食动物损害的分散,这只在高水平的草食动物损害中是有益的。 5.研究得出结论,植物防御的适应性价值高度依赖于生态相互作用,主要是由对光照的竞争结果决定的。
  • 《生态系统多样性来自:植物与食草动物的强相互作用》

    • 来源专题:土壤、生物与环境
    • 编译者:李卫民
    • 发布时间:2017-03-28
    • In the past decades, we have seen a dramatic decline in biodiversity around the world. Every day, species are irrecoverably lost on an unprecedented scale. This also has an impact on the stability and productivity of ecosystems. Hence it is indispensable to understand the mechanisms that impact biodiversity, particularly in the case of primary producers such as algae and plants that form the basis of nearly all natural food webs and ecosystems. Sophie Gröndahl is a doctoral researcher in the working group of Dr Patrick Fink at the University of Cologne's Zoological Institute. In an experimental study on algae from freshwater biofilms, she was able to show that both the availability of nutrients and the diversity of consumer species (herbivores) have a significant positive impact on the diversity of photosynthetic organisms. This means that a high degree of biodiversity on one level of the food chain has a positive impact on biodiversity on the level directly below it. Fink and Gröndahl moreover found out that nutrient availability and the diversity of consumer species do not impact the biodiversity of the algae population separately, but rather interact and mutually influence each other. For example, if nutrient pollution is high -- which is often the case in the overfertilization of freshwater caused by humans -- the positive effect of the greater diversity of herbivorous consumers on the biodiversity of the algae population is lost. In an overfertilized system, it appears that one of the most important mechanisms sustaining producer diversity no longer functions correctly, which has far-reaching ramifications for our understanding of how to maintain biodiversity -- not only in freshwater environments, but in all kinds of ecosystems. The study 'Consumer species richness and nutrients interact in determining producer diversity' was published in the current issue of Scientific Reports. It is part of the research project 'Interactions between consumer and resource diversity under changing environmental conditions' at the University of Cologne, which is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG).