《Lancet,9月17日,Assessing a novel, lab-free, point-of-care test for SARS-CoV-2 (CovidNudge): a diagnostic accuracy study》

  • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
  • 编译者: zhangmin
  • 发布时间:2020-10-13
  • Assessing a novel, lab-free, point-of-care test for SARS-CoV-2 (CovidNudge): a diagnostic accuracy study
    Malick M Gibani, D Phil †
    Prof Christofer Toumazou, PhD †
    Mohammadreza Sohbati, PhD
    Rashmita Sahoo, PhD
    Maria Karvela, PhD
    Tsz-Kin Hon, PhD
    et al.
    Open AccessPublished:September 17, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30121-X

    Summary
    Background
    Access to rapid diagnosis is key to the control and management of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Laboratory RT-PCR testing is the current standard of care but usually requires a centralised laboratory and significant infrastructure. We describe our diagnostic accuracy assessment of a novel, rapid point-of-care real time RT-PCR CovidNudge test, which requires no laboratory handling or sample pre-processing.
    Methods
    Between April and May, 2020, we obtained two nasopharyngeal swab samples from individuals in three hospitals in London and Oxford (UK). Samples were collected from three groups: self-referred health-care workers with suspected COVID-19; patients attending emergency departments with suspected COVID-19; and hospital inpatient admissions with or without suspected COVID-19. For the CovidNudge test, nasopharyngeal swabs were inserted directly into a cartridge which contains all reagents and components required for RT-PCR reactions, including multiple technical replicates of seven SARS-CoV-2 gene targets (rdrp1, rdrp2, e-gene, n-gene, n1, n2 and n3) and human ribonuclease P (RNaseP) as sample adequacy control. Swab samples were tested in parallel using the CovidNudge platform, and with standard laboratory RT-PCR using swabs in viral transport medium for processing in a central laboratory. The primary analysis was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the point-of-care CovidNudge test with laboratory-based testing.

  • 原文来源:https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(20)30121-X/fulltext#%20
相关报告
  • 《J Infection,6月21日,Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:zhangmin
    • 发布时间:2020-06-22
    • Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19 Author links open overlay panelTristan W.ClarkabcdNathan JBrendishabStephenPooleabcVasanth V.NaidubChristopherMansbridgebNicholasNortonbHelenWheelercLauraPreslandcSeanEwingse Show more https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.051 Abstract Introduction Management of the COVID-19 pandemic is hampered by long delays associated with centralised laboratory PCR testing. In hospitals this leads to poor patient flow and nosocomial transmission and so rapid, accurate diagnostic tests are urgently required. The FebriDx is a point-of-care test that detects an antiviral host response protein in finger prick blood within 10 minutes, but its accuracy for the identification of COVID-19 is unknown. Methods We performed a real-world diagnostic accuracy study of FebriDx in hospitalised patients during the first wave of the pandemic. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated based on FebriDx results compared to the reference standard of SARS-CoV-2 PCR on combined nose and throat swabs. A multivariable predictive model including FebriDx, age, sex, and clinical characteristics was developed and underwent internal validation.
  • 《MedRxiv,2月17日,Optimizing diagnostic strategy for novel coronavirus pneumonia, a multi-center study in Eastern China》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:dingxq
    • 发布时间:2020-02-18
    • Optimizing diagnostic strategy for novel coronavirus pneumonia, a multi-center study in Eastern China Jing-Wen Ai, Hao-Cheng Zhang, Teng Xu, Jing Wu, Mengqi Zhu, Yi-Qi Yu, Han-Yue Zhang, Zhongliang Shen, Yang Li, Xian Zhou, Guo-Qing Zang, Jie Xu, Wen-Jing Chen, Yong-Jun Li, De-Sheng Xie, Ming-Zhe Zhou, Jing-Ying Sun, Jia-Zhen Chen, Wen-Hong Zhang doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.13.20022673 Abstract COVID-19 caused by a novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 emerged in Wuhan, Hubei province since December 2019, and caused a rapid outbreak throughout China and globally. Cities outside Hubei are also facing great challenge and require implementing of effective and feasible strategy in precision diagnosing novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP). We described a multicenter prospective study on diagnostic strategy of suspected NCP patients from January 22nd to February 9th, 2020 in Eastern China cities. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from the patients. The epidemiological characteristics, clinical symptoms, laboratory assessments, and computed tomographic (CT) scans were obtained. Pathogen screen were performed including RT-PCR, multiplex PCR, rapid flu antigen tests and mNGS. We enrolled 53 suspected NCP patients, among whom 20 were laboratory-confirmed. Fourteen (70%) and 3 (15%) patients were positive for the first and second SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test, respectively. All NCP patients were positive for mNGS. Chest CT images and the symptoms of early stage NCP patients were similar to other viral pneumonia patients. We identified 11 of 20 co-infections in NCP cases, including regular respiratory virus, fungi and bacteria synchronously. Genomic analysis showed that 8 of 10 cases had no mutation in virus genome, while 2 cases had only one single mutation in N gene. Our study discovered that a combination of chest CT, SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and multi-plex PCR is recommended in regions outside Hubei province. Co-infection of other pathogens with SARS-CoV-2 exists and should be acknowledged. Repeated sampling, change of specimen type or metagenomics sequencing could further facilitate during critical clinical cases. *注,本文为预印本论文手稿,是未经同行评审的初步报告,其观点仅供科研同行交流,并不是结论性内容,请使用者谨慎使用.