《LANCET,4月2日,Monitoring the COVID-19 epidemic in the context of widespread local transmission》

  • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
  • 编译者: zhangmin
  • 发布时间:2020-04-05
  • Monitoring the COVID-19 epidemic in the context of widespread local transmission

    Alberto L García-Basteiro

    Carlos Chaccour

    Caterina Guinovart

    Anna Llupià

    Joe Brew

    Antoni Trilla

    et al.

    Published:April 02, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30162-4

    Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a novel viral disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which was first detected in Wuhan, China, in December, 2019.1 Given the fast spread, the severity of disease, the increasing number of cases outside China, and the number of affected countries, WHO declared the rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 a pandemic on March 11, 2020.2 The availability of reliable surveillance platforms is crucial to monitor the COVID-19 epidemic in a timely manner and to respond with adequate control measures. Since the beginning of the outbreak, different countries have used different testing approaches and criteria, depending on their resources and capacity.

  • 原文来源:https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30162-4/fulltext
相关报告
  • 《Lancet,3月6日,Are high-performing health systems resilient against the COVID-19 epidemic?》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:xuwenwhlib
    • 发布时间:2020-03-07
    • Are high-performing health systems resilient against the COVID-19 epidemic? Helena Legido-Quigley,Nima Asgari,Yik Ying Teo,Gabriel M Leung,Hitoshi Oshitani,Keiji Fukuda et al. Published:March 06, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30551-1 As of March 5, 2020, there has been sustained local transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Japan.1 Containment strategies seem to have prevented smaller transmission chains from amplifying into widespread community transmission. The health systems in these locations have generally been able to adapt,2, 3 but their resilience could be affected if the COVID-19 epidemic continues for many more months and increasing numbers of people require services. We outline some of the core dimensions of these resilient health systems4 and their responses to the COVID-19 epidemic. First, after variable periods of adaptation, the three locations took actions to manage the outbreak of a new pathogen. Surveillance systems were readjusted to identify potential cases while public health staff identified their contacts. National laboratory networks developed diagnostic tests once the COVID-19 genetic sequences were published5 and laboratory testing capacity was increased in all three locations, although expansion of the diagnostic capacity to university and large private laboratories in Japan is still ongoing. In Hong Kong, initially, only pneumonia patients without a microbiological diagnosis were tested, but surveillance has been broadened to include all inpatients with pneumonia and a purposively sampled proportion of outpatients and emergency attendees totalling about 1500 per day (Leung GM, unpublished). Japan's testing strategy has also evolved with diagnostic tests now offered to all suspected cases irrespective of their travel history; however, there are reports of cases that should have been tested but were not.
  • 《LANCET,4月2日,Monitoring behavioural insights related to COVID-19》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:zhangmin
    • 发布时间:2020-04-03
    • Monitoring behavioural insights related to COVID-19 Cornelia Betsch Lothar H Wieler Katrine Habersaat on behalf of theCOSMO group† Show footnotes Published:April 02, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30729-7 The rapidly evolving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is placing an overwhelming burden on health systems and authorities to respond with effective and appropriate interventions, policies, and messages. A critical element in reducing transmission of the virus is rapid and widespread behavioural change. Evidence shows that a perceived lack of consistency, competence, fairness, objectivity, empathy, or sincerity in crisis response in the public could lead to distrust and fear.1 Conversely, when the public perceives measures as having these characteristics, as well as being easily understood and communicated through trusted and accessible channels, and when the necessary services are available, people are able to make informed choices, protect themselves, and comply with recommended practices.