《Lancet,3月24日,Early in the epidemic: impact of preprints on global discourse about COVID-19 transmissibility》

  • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
  • 编译者: xuwenwhlib
  • 发布时间:2020-03-25
  • Early in the epidemic: impact of preprints on global discourse about COVID-19 transmissibility

    Maimuna S Majumder

    Kenneth D Mandl

    Open AccessPublished:March 24, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30113-3

    Since it was first reported by WHO in Jan 5, 2020, over 80?000 cases of a novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) have been diagnosed in China, with exportation events to nearly 90 countries, as of March 6, 2020.1 Given the novelty of the causative pathogen (named SARS-CoV-2), scientists have rushed to fill epidemiological, virological, and clinical knowledge gaps—resulting in over 50 new studies about the virus between January 10 and January 30 alone.2 However, in an era where the immediacy of information has become an expectation of decision makers and the general public alike, many of these studies have been shared first in the form of preprint papers—before peer review.

  • 原文来源:https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(20)30113-3/fulltext
相关报告
  • 《SSRN,2月12日,Early in the Epidemic: Impact of Preprints on Global Discourse of 2019-nCOV Transmissibility》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:zhangmin
    • 发布时间:2020-02-13
    • Early in the Epidemic: Impact of Preprints on Global Discourse of 2019-nCOV Transmissibility 12 Pages Posted: 12 Feb 2020 Maimuna S. Majumder Boston Children's Hospital - Computational Health Informatics Program Kenneth D. Mandl Harvard University - Computational Health Informatics Program Date Written: February 11, 2020 Abstract As of February 11, 2020, more than 43,000 cases of a novel coronavirus (2019–nCoV) have been reported worldwide. Using publicly available data regarding the transmissibility potential (i.e. basic reproduction number) of 2019–nCoV, we demonstrate that relevant preprint studies generated considerable search and news media interest prior to the publication of peer-reviewed studies in the same topic area. We then show that preprint estimate ranges for the basic reproduction number associated with 2019–nCoV overlap with those presented by peer-reviewed studies that were published at a later date. Taken together, we argue that preprints are capable of driving global discourse during public health crises; however, we recommend that a consensus-based approach – as we have employed here – be considered as a means of assessing the robustness of preprint findings prior to peer review.
  • 《MedRxiv,3月24日,Predicting the number of reported and unreported cases for the COVID-19 epidemic in South Korea, Italy, France and Germany》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:zhangmin
    • 发布时间:2020-03-25
    • Predicting the number of reported and unreported cases for the COVID-19 epidemic in South Korea, Italy, France and Germany pierre magal, Glenn Webb doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.21.20040154 Abstract We model the COVID-19 coronavirus epidemic in South Korea, Italy, France, and Germany. We use early reported case data to predict the cumulative number of reported cases to a final size. The key features of our model are the timing of implementation of major public policies restricting social movement, the identification and isolation of unreported cases, and the impact of asymptomatic infectious cases. *注,本文为预印本论文手稿,是未经同行评审的初步报告,其观点仅供科研同行交流,并不是结论性内容,请使用者谨慎使用.