《Personal and psychological factors affecting the successful development of solar energy use in Yemen power sector: A case study》

  • 来源专题:太阳能监测服务
  • 编译者: zhouwei@iet.cn
  • 发布时间:2016-03-15
  • The development of the use of renewable energy (RE) to alleviate the electricity, fuel crises and poverty in Yemen and most developing countries is a crucial issue, which is significantly influenced by the psychological, contextual, and personal factors affecting public acceptance. This study aims to determine the personal and psychological determinants that influence the public?s knowledge of and attitudes and behavioral intentions toward solar energy use in the power sector in urban and rural areas in Yemen. In this study, the people?s behavioral intentions are evaluated by measuring their willingness to pay, willingness to change the currently used electricity source during power outages, and willingness to invest in the feed-in tariff (FiT) scheme. In this context, face-to-face interviews using a self-structured questionnaire were conducted with 348 households in Aden governorate (urban area) and 258 households in Lahj governorate (rural area). The results showed that, although the people in both areas are not well informed about RE resources, the benefits and drawbacks of solar energy use in the power sector, and the solar power technologies, they have highly positive attitudes toward the use of RE. Furthermore, 66%, 55.7%, and 78.4% of the urban population and 70%, 55.4%, and 75.6% of the rural population are willing to pay, to change electricity source, and to invest in FiT scheme, respectively. The findings also showed that existing small-scale solar projects have played a significant role in gaining public acceptance, particularly in rural areas that have higher installation and usage levels than urban area. Consequently, implementing pilot projects, disseminating information through formal and informal education, setting appropriate RE policies, and improving people?s livelihood in different country?s regions will lead to achieve a sustainable development of RE use.

相关报告
  • 《Solar Power Project》

    • 来源专题:可再生能源
    • 编译者:武春亮
    • 发布时间:2024-12-16
    • December 13, 2024 December 13, 2024 53 minutes ago Tina Casey 0 Comments Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News ! Back in the early days of the renewable energy revolution, critics complained that solar panels don’t work in cold weather. Well, that was then. The cold weather myth has been busted over and over again. The critics can keep whining all they want, but an important new 1.3 gigawatt solar power project in the chilly US northern state of Wisconsin is moving forward, with water conservation and biodiversity benefits along with the clean kilowatts. Less Nuclear Power — And More Solar Power — For A Cold Climate State Wisconsin has been a solid performer on installed solar capacity, an impressive feat for state with legendarily cold winters . It currently holds down the #18 position in the 50-state ranking tracked by the Solar Energy Industries Association , with a total of just over 2.6 gigawatts. It’s also worth noting that Wisconsin ranked #9 just last year. All else being equal, the new 1.3-gigawatt project will boost Wisconsin up the solar capacity rankings on completion, which is projected for 2026. In terms of alternative zero emission energy resources, that 2026 completion date is significant. There has been a big push of late to accelerate nuclear development in the US, a movement partly driven by data center stakeholders. However, it’s difficult to beat the short timeline and relatively low cost of building the equivalent capacity in solar power. Exhibit A is the expansion of the Vogtle nuclear facility in South Carolina, adding two new units. “When Georgia approved the Vogtle expansion in 2009, the two reactors were expected to cost about $14 billion and enter service in 2016 and 2017. However, along with the delays, the costs have ballooned to $30 billion ,” Reuters reported in April of this year, when the second unit finally began commercial operation seven years after expected. Within a far shorter timeline and far lower cost, the new solar power plant in Wisconsin will add about the same power generation capacity as the state’s only remaining operational nuclear facility, Point Beach. In addition to upfront savings, the new solar power plant will also minimize the cost of emergency planning. As explained by Point Beach owner NextEra Energy, nuclear power requires a considerable public safety commitment. “State and local officials, together with NextEra Energy Resources, have prepared a detailed emergency plan to protect people who live, work, visit or go to school within 10 miles of the plant,” NextEra explains. “The plan, which is updated annually, is tested by drills, evaluated exercises and inspections.” A New Solar Power Plant, With Bottom Line Benefits “Conducting emergency drills improves the overall readiness of local authorities and enhances their ability to respond to emergencies,” NextEra adds. Emergency drills also cost money and time that could be saved or spent elsewhere. That’s something to think about as nuclear advocates eyeball the prospect of reviving two other nuclear facilities in Wisconsin, Kewaunee and La Crosse. Meanwhile, the 1.3 additional gigawatts’ worth of solar power in the pipeline comes under the name of Vista Sands, a project of the up-and-coming Pennsylvania solar developer Doral Renewables. The project, to be located in a rural area of Portage County, received verbal approval during an open hearing of the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin earlier this week and Doral kindly emailed CleanTechnica with the news in advance of a written order from the Commission. In this day and age of heated opposition to rural solar development it’s worth asking how Vista Sands managed to get this far. Doral credits a meaningful community engagement effort, unbeatable bottom line benefits, and strong public policy support from state lawmakers and voters. “With years of careful planning and deep community engagement, Vista Sands’ approval represents a transformative opportunity for local economies in Portage County and a major step forward for Wisconsin in achieving its goal of net-zero carbon emissions by 2050,” explains Jon Baker, Doral’s VP of Development and Vista Sands Project Manager. By the numbers, Vista Sands will create 500 construction jobs and 50 permanent jobs, while pumping $6 million into utility aid payments in support of local communities on top of local tax revenues. Based on a report prepared by the engineering consulting firm Quantum Energy, Doral also puts the value of local and global public health and ecosystem conservation benefits at $630 million in the first year alone. Try This With Your Nuclear Power Plant Nuclear advocates often cite the smaller footprint of nuclear power plants as an advantage over solar power, but the solar industry is rapidly making the footprint issue irrelevant. In the early days of the solar industry, costs were high and developers cut corners by minimizing ground treatment expenses, either by laying down gravel or replanting with a short ground cover. Now that the cost of solar power has plummeted, developers are making the case for solar projects to prevent erosion and improve soil health along with water conservation and native species restoration. The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel cites the organization Clean Wisconsin, which submitted documents in support of the Vista Sands project to the Public Service Commission. “Vista Sands is also likely to have significant water benefits in Portage County, boosting aquifer levels and reducing contamination in the water-depleted Central Sands region,” MJS noted on December 12. “ The solar farm is anticipated to take 56 high-capacity wells out of normal operation and will greatly reduce the estimated 3 million pounds of fertilizer and 73,000 gallons of insecticide currently spread across the project area every year.” Next Steps For Solar Power Nuclear advocates are gonna advocate, but they may be underestimating the pace at which the solar industry can adapt and beat nuclear energy in terms of land use, emergency planning resources, and environmental benefits as well as offering more bang for the ratepayer buck and a shorter construction timeline, as solar developers incorporate regenerative agriculture principles and agrivoltaic features into their plans (see more agrivoltaic background here ). Vista Sands will encompass 9,500 acres of private land, which will remain in the hands of its owners. That is much larger than the footprint of a typical nuclear facility, but the project also involves restoring between 5,700 and 7,900 acres of farmland to native grasslands. The restoration will help contribute to ecosystem health in a nearby wildlife area. “Vista Sands Solar’s ecologists have designed a seed mix for the Project’s paneled areas that aims to restore suitable habitats for native species of birds, small mammals, reptiles, and pollinating insects,” Doral explains. “The seed mix is comprised of 17 native grass and sedge species and 31 native wildflower species,” the company adds. The solar array was also designed to avoid impacts on the breeding grounds of the Greater Prairie-chicken, though hard evidence will have to wait until the results of a monitoring program are available. Doral launched just five years ago and it is already pushing the agrivoltaic envelope. Keep an eye on the company’s 400-megawatt Mammoth Solar project in Indiana, which hosts about 2,500 grazing animals, including sheep, alpacas, Kunekune pigs, and donkeys. Future plans involve establishing pollinator habitats and growing food crops for humans between the solar panels. Follow me via LinkTree , or @tinamcasey on LinkedIn and Bluesky. Photo (cropped): A massive new 1.3 gigawatt solar power plant will feature thousands of acres of restored native grasslands while conserving water and reducing agricultural chemicals near a wildlife preserve (courtesy of Doral Renewables). Chip in a few dollars a month to help support independent cleantech coverage that helps to accelerate the cleantech revolution! Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here . Sign up for our daily newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day . Or sign up for our weekly one if daily is too frequent. Advertisement CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here . CleanTechnica's Comment Policy Share this story! LinkedIn WhatsApp Facebook Bluesky Email Reddit
  • 《Technical and economic analysis of integrating low-medium temperature solar energy into power plant》

    • 来源专题:太阳能监测服务
    • 编译者:zhouwei@iet.cn
    • 发布时间:2016-03-15
    • In order to mitigate CO2 emission and improve the efficiency of the utilization of solar thermal energy (STE), solar thermal energy is proposed to be integrated into a power plant. In this paper, seven configurations were studied regarding the integration of STE. A 300MWe subcritical coal-fired plant was selected as the reference, chemical absorption using monoethanolamine solvent was employed for CO2 ?capture, and parabolic trough collectors and evacuated tube collectors were used for STE collection. Both technical analysis and economic evaluation were conducted. Results show that integrating solar energy with post-combustion CO2? capture can effectively increase power generation and reduce the electrical efficiency penalty caused by CO2 capture. Among the different configurations, Config-2 and Config-6, which use medium temperature STE to replace high pressure feedwater without and with CO2 capture, show the highest net incremental solar efficiency. When building new plants, integrating solar energy can effectively reduce the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). The lowest LCOE, 99.28USD/MWh, results from Config-6, with a parabolic trough collector price of 185USD/m2. When retrofitting existing power plants, Config-6 also shows the highest net present value (NPV), while Config-2 has the shortest payback time at a carbon tax of 50USD/ton CO2. In addition, both LCOE and NPV/payback time are clearly affected by the relative solar load fraction, the price of solar thermal collectors and the carbon tax. Comparatively, the carbon tax can affect the configurations with CO2 capture more clearly than those without CO2 capture.