《MedRxiv,5月23日,Effects of a DPP-4 inhibitor and RAS blockade on clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes and COVID-19》

  • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
  • 编译者: zhangmin
  • 发布时间:2020-05-24
  • Effects of a DPP-4 inhibitor and RAS blockade on clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes and COVID-19

    View ORCID ProfileSang Youl Rhee, Jeongwoo Lee, Hyewon Nam, Dae-Sung Kyoung, View ORCID ProfileDae Jung Kim

    doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.20.20108555

    Abstract

    Background: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade are reported to affect the clinical course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). However, the effectiveness of these drugs in large populations is unclear. Subjects and Methods: As of May 2020, data analysis was conducted on all subjects who could confirm their history of claims related to COVID-19 in the National Health Review and Assessment Service database in Korea. Using the COVID-19 and claims data of the past 5 years, we compared the short-term prognosis of COVID-19 infection according to the use of DPP-4i and RAS blockade. Results: Totally, data of 67850 subjects were accessible. Of these, 5080 were confirmed COVID-19. Among these, 832 subjects with DM were selected for analysis in this study. Among the subjects, 263 (31.6%) and 327 (39.3%) were DPP-4i and RAS blockade users, respectively.

    *注,本文为预印本论文手稿,是未经同行评审的初步报告,其观点仅供科研同行交流,并不是结论性内容,请使用者谨慎使用.

  • 原文来源:https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.20.20108555v1
相关报告
  • 《5月23日_DPP-4抑制剂和RAS抑制剂对糖尿病和COVID-19合并症患者临床结局的影响》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:xuwenwhlib
    • 发布时间:2020-05-24
    • 信息名称:DPP-4抑制剂和RAS抑制剂对糖尿病和COVID-19合并症患者临床结局的影响 1.时间:2020年5月23日 2.机构或团队:庆熙大学医学院、韩国HANMI韩美药业有限公司、亚洲大学医学院 3.事件概要: 庆熙大学医学院联合多家机构在medRxiv预印本平台发表论文“Effects of a DPP-4 inhibitor and RAS blockade on clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes and COVID-19”。 DPP-4抑制剂和肾素-血管紧张素系统RAS抑制剂可影响患有糖尿病合并2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的临床病程。然而,这些药物在大量人群中的有效性还不清楚。截至2020年5月,文章通过韩国国家卫生审查和评估服务数据库,对所有能够证实其与COVID-19相关的数据进行分析。基于COVID-19和过去5年的数据,文章根据使用DPP-4抑制剂和RAS抑制剂对COVID-19感染的短期预后进行了比较。文章共纳入67850例受试者的数据,其中,新冠肺炎确诊病例5080例,选择其中832例患有糖尿病患者进行分析。DPP-4i和RAS阻断剂使用人数分别为263人(31.6%)和327人(39.3%),34名受试者(4.09%)接受重症监护或死亡。DPP-4i组中转移至重度治疗的比例为0.362,RAS组的比例为0.599。使用这两种药物的受试者没有观察到协同作用。这项基于人群的研究表明,DPP-4i在COVID-19患者中显示更好的临床结果,而RAS的效果并不显著。 *注,本文为预印本论文手稿,是未经同行评审的初步报告,其观点仅供科研同行交流,并不是结论性内容,请使用者谨慎使用。 4.附件: 原文链接:https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.20.20108555v1
  • 《MedRxiv,2月23日,Clinical characteristics of 51 patients discharged from hospital with COVID-19 in Chongqing,China》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:xuwenwhlib
    • 发布时间:2020-02-24
    • Clinical characteristics of 51 patients discharged from hospital with COVID-19 in Chongqing,China liu lei, Gao Jian-ya doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.20.20025536 Abstract Abstract Background:Since December 2019, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2)-infected disease (Coronavirus Disease 2019,COVID-19) emerged in Wuhan , China,and rapidly spread throughout China,even throughout the world. We try to describe the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in non-Wuhan area,and explore its effective treatment. Methods:Retrospective, single-center case series of the 51 hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 at Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital in Chongqing, China, from January 20 to February 3, 2020;The discharge time was from January 29 to February 11, 2020. The main results and indicators of epidemiology, demography, clinical manifestation, laboratory examination, imaging data and treatment data of 51 patients with covid-19 were collected and analyzed. The changes of blood routine and biochemical indexes at discharge and admission were compared. Compare the clinical characteristics of severe patients (including severe and critical patients) and non- severe patients (general patients). Results: Of 51 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, the median age was 45 years (interquartile range, 34-51; range, 16-68 years) and 32 (62.7%) were men.43(84.3%)patients had been to Wuhan or Other Hubei areas outside Wuhan,and 4(7.7%) patients had a clear contact history of COVID-19 patients before the onset of the disease, and 4(7.7%) patients had no clear epidemiological history of COVID-19.Common symptoms included fever (43 [84.3%]), cough (38 [74.5%]) and fatigue (22 [43.1%]). Lymphopenia was observed in 26 patients (51.0%), and elevated C-reactive protein level in 32 patients (62.7%). Ground-glass opacity was the typical radiological finding on chest computed tomography (41 [80.4%]),Local consolidation of pneumonia in some patients(17 [33.3%]).Most of the patients were treated with traditional Chinese medicine decoction (28 [54.9%]),all of them received aerosol inhalation of recombinant human interferon a-1b for injection and oral antiviral therapy with Lopinavir and Ritonavir tablets (51 [100%]); Most of the patients were given Bacillus licheniformis capsules regulated intestinal flora treatment (44 [86.3%]). 10 patients (19.6%) received short-term (3-5 days) glucocorticoid treatment. Compared with non-severe patients (n = 44), severe patients (n = 7) were older (median age, 52 years vs 44 years), had a higher proportion of diabetes mellitus (4 [57.1%] vs 0 [0.0%]), most of them needed antibiotic treatment (7 [100%] vs 4 [9.1%], most of them needed nutritional diet (6 [85.7%) vs 0 [0.0%], and were more likely to have dyspnea (6 [85.7%] vs 5 [11.4%]),most of them needed noninvasive mechanical ventilation (6 [85.7%] vs 0 [0.0%]). Except one patient died, the remaining 50 patients were discharged according to the discharge standard, the common clinical symptoms disappeared basically, the lymphocyte increased significantly (P=0.008), CRP decreased significantly (P <0.001). The median length of stay was 12 days (IQR, 9-13). Conclusion:In 51 single center cases confirmed as COVID-19 and discharged from the hospital, 13.7% of the patients were severe. The main clinical symptoms of patients with COVID-19 were fever, cough and asthenia,Some patients had obvious dyspnea. They had clinical laboratory and radiologic characteristics. There is no specific drug treatment for the disease. For the treatment of COVID-19, in addition to oxygen inhalation and antiviral treatment, attention should be paid to the dialectical treatment of traditional Chinese medicine, regulation of intestinal flora, nutritional support treatment and other comprehensive treatment. *注,本文为预印本论文手稿,是未经同行评审的初步报告,其观点仅供科研同行交流,并不是结论性内容,请使用者谨慎使用.