《LANCET,6月4日,Active case finding with case management: the key to tackling the COVID-19 pandemic》

  • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
  • 编译者: xuwenwhlib
  • 发布时间:2020-06-05
  • Active case finding with case management: the key to tackling the COVID-19 pandemic
    Prof Zhongjie Li, PhD *
    Qiulan Chen, PhD *
    Prof Luzhao Feng, PhD
    Lance Rodewald, MD
    Yinyin Xia, PhD
    Hailiang Yu, MMed
    et al.
    Show all authors
    Show footnotes
    Published:June 04, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31278-2

    Summary
    COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by WHO on March 11, 2020, the first non-influenza pandemic, affecting more than 200 countries and areas, with more than 5·9 million cases by May 31, 2020. Countries have developed strategies to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic that fit their epidemiological situations, capacities, and values. We describe China's strategies for prevention and control of COVID-19 (containment and suppression) and their application, from the perspective of the COVID-19 experience to date in China. Although China has contained severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and nearly stopped indigenous transmission, a strong suppression effort must continue to prevent re-establishment of community transmission from importation-related cases. We believe that case finding and management, with identification and quarantine of close contacts, are vitally important containment measures and are essential in China's pathway forward. We describe the next steps planned in China that follow the containment effort. We believe that sharing countries' experiences will help the global community manage the COVID-19 pandemic by identifying what works in the struggle against SARS-CoV-2.

  • 原文来源:https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31278-2/fulltext
相关报告
  • 《LANCET,4月6日,Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:xuwenwhlib
    • 发布时间:2020-04-07
    • Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations Jason Phua, MRCP,Li Weng, MD,Lowell Ling, MRCP,Moritoki Egi, MD,Prof Chae-Man Lim, MD,Prof Jigeeshu Vasishtha Divatia, MD Published:April 06, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30161-2 As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spreads across the world, the intensive care unit (ICU) community must prepare for the challenges associated with this pandemic. Streamlining of workflows for rapid diagnosis and isolation, clinical management, and infection prevention will matter not only to patients with COVID-19, but also to health-care workers and other patients who are at risk from nosocomial transmission. Management of acute respiratory failure and haemodynamics is key. ICU practitioners, hospital administrators, governments, and policy makers must prepare for a substantial increase in critical care bed capacity, with a focus not just on infrastructure and supplies, but also on staff management. Critical care triage to allow the rationing of scarce ICU resources might be needed. Researchers must address unanswered questions, including the role of repurposed and experimental therapies. Collaboration at the local, regional, national, and international level offers the best chance of survival for the critically ill.
  • 《LANCET,4月6日,School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review》

    • 来源专题:COVID-19科研动态监测
    • 编译者:xuwenwhlib
    • 发布时间:2020-04-07
    • School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review Prof Russell M Viner, PhD Simon J Russell, PhD Helen Croker, PhD Jessica Packer, MEpi Joseph Ward, MBBS Claire Stansfield, PhD Published:April 06, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30095-X In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, 107 countries had implemented national school closures by March 18, 2020. It is unknown whether school measures are effective in coronavirus outbreaks (eg, due to severe acute respiratory syndrome [SARS], Middle East respiratory syndrome, or COVID-19). We undertook a systematic review by searching three electronic databases to identify what is known about the effectiveness of school closures and other school social distancing practices during coronavirus outbreaks. We included 16 of 616 identified articles. School closures were deployed rapidly across mainland China and Hong Kong for COVID-19. However, there are no data on the relative contribution of school closures to transmission control. Data from the SARS outbreak in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Singapore suggest that school closures did not contribute to the control of the epidemic. Modelling studies of SARS produced conflicting results. Recent modelling studies of COVID-19 predict that school closures alone would prevent only 2–4% of deaths, much less than other social distancing interventions. Policy makers need to be aware of the equivocal evidence when considering school closures for COVID-19, and that combinations of social distancing measures should be considered. Other less disruptive social distancing interventions in schools require further consideration if restrictive social distancing policies are implemented for long periods.